Skip to main content
Log in

Dusting technique for lithotripsy: what does it mean?

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Urology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Kidney stones are currently managed using laser lithotripsy and the most recent generation of laser generators have enabled the possibility of the dusting technique. Dusting avoids the use of a basket, as stone fragments are spontaneously evacuated; however, no consensus on the definition of dust currently exists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Techniques of laser lithotripsy.

References

  1. Gupta, P. K. Is the holmium:YAG laser the best intracorporeal lithotripter for the ureter? A 3-year retrospective study. J. Endourol. 21, 305–309 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kronenberg, P. & Traxer, O. Update on lasers in urology 2014: current assessment on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers. World J. Urol. 33, 463–469 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spore, S. S. et al. Holmium: YAG lithotripsy: optimal power settings. J. Endourol. 13, 559–566 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Corbin, N. S. et al. Laser lithotripsy and cyanide. J. Endourol. 14, 169–173 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sea, J. et al. Optimal power settings for holmium:YAG lithotripsy. J. Urol. 187, 914–919 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hecht, S. L. & Wolf, J. S. Jr. Techniques for holmium laser lithotripsy of intrarenal calculi. Urology 81, 442–445 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiss, B. & Shah, O. Evaluation of dusting versus basketing — can new technologies improve stone-free rates? Nat. Rev. Urol. 13, 726–733 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Humphreys, M. R. et al. Dusting versus basketing during ureteroscopy: which technique is more efficacious? A prospective multicenter trial from the EDGE Research Consortium. J. Urol. 199, 1272–1276 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, R. et al. High-frequency dusting versus conventional holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal and ureteral calculi. J. Endourol. 31, 272–277 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matlaga, B. R. et al. Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy: a review of dusting versus fragmentation with extraction. J. Endourol. 32, 1–6 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to discussion of content and reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission. S.D. researched data for and wrote the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Traxer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

O.T. is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Coloplast, Olympus, and Rocamed. S.D. is a consultant for Coloplast. E.X.K. and V.D.C. declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doizi, S., Keller, E.X., De Coninck, V. et al. Dusting technique for lithotripsy: what does it mean?. Nat Rev Urol 15, 653–654 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0042-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0042-9

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation