Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

ALZHEIMER DISEASE

Nature and implications of sex differences in AD pathology

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Neurology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

A new study has identified key differences between women and men with regard to the nature and burden of Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology in the brain. In addition to highlighting possible sex differences in AD pathophysiology, the findings could have important implications for the diagnosis and management of this condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1: Sex differences in Alzheimer disease.

References

  1. Scheltens, P. et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 388, 505–517 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mielke, M. M., Vemuri, P. & Rocca, W. A. Clinical epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: assessing sex and gender differences. Clin. Epidemiol. 6, 37–48 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnes, L. L. et al. Sex differences in the clinical manifestations of Alzheimer disease pathology. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 62, 685–691 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hohman, T. J. et al. Sex-specific association of apolipoprotein E with cerebrospinal fluid levels of tau. JAMA Neurol. 75, 989–998 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oveisgharan, S. et al. Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease and common neuropathologies of aging. Acta Neuropathol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1920-1 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buckley, R. F. et al. Sex, amyloid, and APOE ε4 and risk of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: findings from three well-characterized cohorts. Alzheimers Dement. 14, 1193–1203 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Altmann, A. et al. Sex modifies the APOE-related risk of developing Alzheimer disease. Ann. Neurol. 75, 563–573 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Damoiseaux, J. S. et al. Gender modulates the APOE ε4 effect in healthy older adults: convergent evidence from functional brain connectivity and spinal fluid tau levels. J. Neurosci. 32, 8254–8262 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alzheimer’s Association. 2018 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 14, 367–429 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jack, C. R. et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 9, 119–128 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Rosha Babapour Mofrad

  2. Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Wiesje M. van der Flier

Authors
  1. Rosha Babapour Mofrad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wiesje M. van der Flier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wiesje M. van der Flier.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babapour Mofrad, R., van der Flier, W.M. Nature and implications of sex differences in AD pathology. Nat Rev Neurol 15, 6–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0115-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0115-7

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation