Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Considerations of sex as a binary variable in clinical algorithms

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Nephrology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Clinical algorithms that are used to guide medical decision-making often include sex as a variable. However, binary considerations of sex and/or gender might introduce bias due to potentially inaccurate assumptions about sex and gender-specific physiology, hormones and exposures. An equity-focused approach to sex and gender is essential when using clinical algorithms to ensure health equity across populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Lett, E., Logie, C. H. & Mohottige, D. Intersectionality as a lens for achieving kidney health justice. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 19, 353–354 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cary, M. P. Jr et al. Mitigating racial and ethnic bias and advancing health equity in clinical algorithms: a scoping review. Health Aff. (Millwood) 42, 1359–1368 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miranda, K. T. et al. A holistic framework for the evaluation of kidney function in a gender-diverse landscape. Am. J. Kidney Dis. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.01.522 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jankowska, M., Soler, M. J., Stevens, K. I. & Torra, R. Why do we keep ignoring sex in kidney disease? Clin. Kidney J. 16, 2327–2335 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chesnaye, N. C., Carrero, J. J., Hecking, M. & Jager, K. J. Differences in the epidemiology, management and outcomes of kidney disease in men and women. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 20, 7–20 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bairey Merz, C. N. et al. Sex and the kidneys: current understanding and research opportunities. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 15, 776–783 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Witchel, S. F. Disorders of sex development. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 48, 90–102 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaufman, M. R., Eschliman, E. L. & Karver, T. S. Differentiating sex and gender in health research to achieve gender equity. Bull. World Health Organ. 101, 666–671 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Alahamadi, Z. et al. Race, sex, and kidney disease trial participation. Kidney Med. 5, 100594 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gülgöz, S., DeMeules, M., Gelman, S. A. & Olson, K. R. Gender essentialism in transgender and cisgender children. PLoS ONE 14, e0224321 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chin, M. H. et al. A roadmap and best practices for organizations to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health care. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 27, 992–1000 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dinushika Mohottige.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohottige, D., Farouk, S., Poteat, T. et al. Considerations of sex as a binary variable in clinical algorithms. Nat Rev Nephrol 20, 347–348 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-024-00840-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-024-00840-2

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation