Skip to main content
Log in

Let’s fix the system, not the scientists

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Materials

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Diversity initiatives typically focus on empowering scientists from minority backgrounds to navigate academia. Although such efforts can be valuable, the structural barriers faced by minority scientists must also be addressed, particularly in the distribution of research funding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Campbell, L. G. et al. Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science. PLoS One 8, e79147 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shen, H. Inequality quantified: mind the gender gap. Nature 495, 22–24 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rollock, N. Staying power: the career experiences and strategies of UK Black female professors. University and College Union https://www.ucu.org.uk/media/10075/Staying-Power/pdf/UCU_Rollock_February_2019.pdf (2019).

  4. Hruby, D. Sexism is still a problem for German research. Nature 567, S60–S62 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Peplow, M. Women’s work. Nat. Rev. Chem. 3, 283–286 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Written evidence submitted by Professor Rachel Oliver and 203 others. data.parliament.uk http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/science-and-technology-committee/my-science-inquiry/written/94105.html (2018).

  7. Britton, B., Jackson, C. & Wade, J. The reward and risk of social media for academics. Nat. Rev. Chem. 3, 459–461 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oliver, R. A. Select Committees - My Science Inquiry Pitch. YouTube https://youtu.be/6owh4Rw6wuk (2019).

  9. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Correspondence from the Chair of the Committee to Sir Mark Walport, UKRI. parliament.uk https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/science-technology/Correspondence/19-09-09-Chair-to-UKRI-re-data-for-equality-diversity-inclusion-and-accessibility-inquiry.pdf (9 Sep 2019).

  10. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Correspondence from Sir Mark Walport, UKRI, to the Chair of the Committee. parliament.uk https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/science-technology/Correspondence/191030-UKRI%20to%20Chair%20re%20Impact%20of%20funding%20on%20equality%20diversity%20inclusion%20and%20accessibility.pdf (30 Oct 2019).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel A. Oliver.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

R.A.O is a member of The Inclusion Group for Equity in Research in STEMM (TIGERS).

Additional information

Related links

The Inclusion Group for Equity in Research in STEMM (TIGERS): https://www.tigerinstemm.org/home

Irish Research Council: Gender Strategy & Actions: http://research.ie/assets/uploads/2018/08/04108-IRC-Gender-flyer-proof03-single.pdf

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oliver, R.A. Let’s fix the system, not the scientists. Nat Rev Mater 5, 83–84 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-0177-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-0177-1

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation