Skip to main content
Log in

Weaponized genomics: potential threats to international and human security

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Genetics

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Genetic technologies are revolutionizing human health. In parallel, geopolitical instability has prompted renewed discussions on the risks of DNA technology being weaponized in international conflict. With today’s changing security environment, we argue that risk assessments must be broadened from genetically targeted weapons to a series of new domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Lentzos, F. (ed.) Biological threats in the 21st century: The politics, people, science and historical roots (Imperial College Press, 2016).

  2. Kania, E. B. Minds at War: China’s pursuit of military dominance through the cognitive sciences and biotechnology. PRISM 8, 82–101 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lentzos, F. Personalized war: How the genomics revolution will reshape war, espionage, and tyranny… Aporia Magazine https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/personalised-war (2023).

  4. Cyranoski, D. China expands DNA data grab in troubled western region. Nature 545, 395–396 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanokwongnuwut, P., Martin, B., Taylor, D., Kirkbride, K. P. & Linacre, A. How many cells are required for successful DNA profiling? Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 51, 102453 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zmorzynski, S., Styk, W., Klinkosz, W., Iskra, J. & Filip, A. A. Personality traits and polymorphisms of genes coding neurotransmitter receptors or transporters: review of single gene and genome-wide association studies. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 20, 7 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dash, H. R. & Arora, M. CRISPR–CasB technology in forensic DNA analysis: challenges and solutions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 106, 4367–4374 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cyranoski, D. China’s crackdown on genetics breaches could deter data sharing. Nature 563, 301–302 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sero, D. et al. Facial recognition from DNA using face-to-DNA classifiers. Nat. Commun. 10, 2557 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Andorno, R. in The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric (eds von Arnauld, A. et al.) Ch. 26 (Cambridge University Press, 2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for constructive criticism from P. Bacchus (Swedish Armed Forces) and K. Mossman (Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster University, Canada).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Gisselsson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Genetics thanks Filippa Lentzos and Daniel S. Schabacker for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chattopadhyay, S., Ingesson, T., Rinaldi, A. et al. Weaponized genomics: potential threats to international and human security. Nat Rev Genet 25, 1–2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-023-00677-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-023-00677-8

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation