Skip to main content
Log in

Why even specialists struggle with black hole proofs

  • World View
  • Published:

From Nature Physics

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Mathematical proofs of black hole physics are becoming too complex even for specialists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Aschbacher, M. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 51, 736–740 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Solomon, R. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 65, 646–651 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giorgi, E. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 70, 552–563 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giorgi, E., Klainerman, S. & Szeftel, J. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14808 (2022).

  5. Klainerman, S. & Szeftel, J. Pure Appl. Math. Q. 19, 791–1678 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Castelvecchi, D. Nature 595, 18–19 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scholze, P. Blueprint for the liquid tensor experiment https://leanprover-community.github.io/liquid/ (2021).

  8. Scholze, P. Exp. Math. 31, 349–354 (2022).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Penuela Diaz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Penuela Diaz, A. Why even specialists struggle with black hole proofs. Nat. Phys. 20, 522 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02398-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02398-z

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation