Skip to main content
Log in

Effect sizes and what to make of them

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Human Behaviour

View current issue Submit your manuscript

We all care about effect sizes. Yet, traditional ways of evaluating them (P < 0.05 and generic benchmarks) are failing us. We propose two paths forward: setting better, contextualized benchmarks or — more radically — letting go of benchmarks altogether. Both paths point to adjusted expectations, more detailed reporting and slow science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Yarkoni, T. & Westfall, J. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12, 1100–1122 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Götz, F. M., Gosling, S. D. & Rentfrow, P. J. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 205–215 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paluck, E. L. & Cialdini, R. B. in Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (eds Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M.) 81–97 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  4. Jolly, E. & Chang, L. J. Top. Cogn. Sci. 11, 433–454 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakker, A. et al. Educ. Stud. Math. 102, 1–8 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stokes, D. E. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (Brookings Institution Press, 1997).

  7. Cohen, J. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1, 98–101 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Funder, D. C. & Ozer, D. J. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 2, 156–168 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grice, J. W. et al. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 3, 443–455 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anvari, F. et al. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 18, 503–507 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartoš, F. et al. R. Soc. Open Sci. 10, 230224 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fechner, G. T. Elemente der Psychophysik [Elements of Psychophysics] (Breitkopf und Härtel, 1860).

  13. Simonsohn, U. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 1208–1214 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 175 (2021).

  15. Frith, U. Trends Cogn. Sci. 24, 1–2 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich M. Götz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer reviewer information

Nature Human Behaviour thanks David Funder and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Götz, F.M., Gosling, S.D. & Rentfrow, P.J. Effect sizes and what to make of them. Nat Hum Behav 8, 798–800 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01858-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01858-z

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation