Skip to main content
Log in

We need more-diverse biobanks to improve behavioural genetics

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Human Behaviour

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Biobanks have emerged as valuable resources for studying behavioural and social genomics, but are not representative of global populations. Thus, current research findings do not generalize, and exacerbate knowledge and health inequalities. We call on researchers, publishers and funders to address barriers to biobank diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Composition of biobank participants over time as compared to regional and global populations.
Fig. 2: Comparison of socioeconomic and exposure factors between participants of All of Us and the UK Biobank.

References

  1. Okbay, A. et al. Nat. Genet. 54, 437–449 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hill, W. D. et al. Nat. Commun. 10, 5741 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Barcellos, S. H., Carvalho, L. S. & Turley, P. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E9765–E9772 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. He, Y. et al. Diabetes Care 44, 935–943 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. He, Y. & Patel, C. J. Int. J. Epidemiol. 52, 633–640 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. He, Y. Supplementary Methods. figshare.com, https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.24073587 (2023).

  7. Martin, A. R. et al. Nat. Genet. 51, 584–591 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaziano, J. M. et al. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 70, 214–223 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carey, D. J. et al. Genet. Med. 18, 906–913 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. The All of Us Research Program Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 668–676 (2019).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou, W. et al. Cell Genomics 2, 100192 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Prictor, M., Teare, H. J. A. & Kaye, J. Front. Public Health 6, 253 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rao, A. et al. Biopreserv. Biobank. 17, 129–138 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Odeh, H. et al. Biopreserv. Biobank. 13, 421–429 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health NHGRI under award number T32HG010464 (to Y.H.), and National Institute of Mental Health under award number K99/R00MH117229 (to A.R.M.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicia R. Martin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, Y., Martin, A.R. We need more-diverse biobanks to improve behavioural genetics. Nat Hum Behav 8, 197–200 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01795-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01795-3

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation