Whether conservatives or liberals have higher sensitivity towards underrepresentation depends on the target of the judgement: conservatives are shown to have higher thresholds than liberals for indicating bias against traditionally nondominant groups, whereas liberals have higher bias thresholds regarding dominant groups. However, such relationships weaken when the targets of bias are unknown or ideologically irrelevant to the observer, which emphasizes the context-dependency of such bias judgements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Ditto, P. H. et al. At least bias is bipartisan: a meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 14, 273–291 (2019). This paper presents a meta-analysis supporting the symmetry hypothesis (that liberals and conservatives are similarly biased).
Baron, J. & Jost, J. T. False equivalence: are liberals and conservatives in the United States equally biased? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 14, 292–303 (2019). This paper refutes the paper above and argues for the asymmetry hypothesis (that conservatives are more biased than liberals).
Brandt, M. J. & Crawford, J. T. Worldview conflict and prejudice. Adv. Exp. Social Psychol. 61, 1–66 (2020). This paper reviews research on the relationship between political ideology and prejudice and discusses two competing hypotheses (‘traditional’ versus worldview conflict), the tension between which is similar to that between the asymmetry and symmetry hypotheses.
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M. & Napier, J. L. Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60, 307–337 (2009). This review covers research on structure, contents and functions of ideological belief systems.
Kivikangas, J. M., Fernández-Castilla, B., Järvelä, S., Ravaja, N. & Lönnqvist, J.-E. Moral foundations and political orientation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 147, 55–94 (2021). This paper reviews research on the association between political orientation and moral foundations.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This is a summary of: Kim, J. & Zauberman, G. The relationship between political ideology and judgments of bias in distributional outcomes. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01779-3 (2024).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Judgements of bias vary with observers’ political ideology and targets’ characteristics. Nat Hum Behav 8, 203–204 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01780-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01780-w
- Springer Nature Limited