Skip to main content
Log in

Variability in neuroimaging research is not always wrong

  • World View
  • Published:

From Nature Human Behaviour

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Variability in neuroimaging results has many causes and no solution. We need to be mindful of potential sources of discrepant results rather than dismiss them as human error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Goldfarb, M. G. & Brown, D. R. Neuroimage 254, 119122 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kopal, J., Uddin, L. Q. & Bzdok, D. Nat. Methods 20, 1122–1128 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang, D. W. et al. Sci. Rep. 10, 20905 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kapoor, M. et al. BMJ Open 9, e026850 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Prasad, S. et al. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 105, 111–113 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shweta Prasad.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prasad, S. Variability in neuroimaging research is not always wrong. Nat Hum Behav 7, 2048–2049 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01767-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01767-7

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation