Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A clean energy future isn’t set in stone

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Geoscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Social scientists and geoscientists must work together to critically evaluate and develop feasible visions for a sustainable future. Is a clean-energy economy more viable than a degrowth future?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Wilkinson, B. H. Geology 33, 161–164 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper, A. H., Brown, T. J., Price, S. J., Ford, J. R. & Waters, C. N. Anthropocene Rev. 5, 222–229 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoggard, M. J. et al. Nat. Geosci. 13, 504–510 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jasanoff, S. & Kim, S.-H. Sci. Cult. 22, 189–196 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kerschner, C., Wächter, P., Nierling, L. & Ehlers, M.-H. J. Clean. Prod. 197, 1619–1636 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Andersen, M. S. & Massa, I. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2, 337–345 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buttel, F. H. Geoforum 31, 57–65 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hickel, J. & Kallis, G. New Political Econ. 25, 469–486 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vadén, T. et al. Environ. Sci. Policy 112, 236–244 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vadén, T. et al. Environ. Politics 30, 462–476 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sovacool, B. K. et al. Science 367, 30–33 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuipers, K. J. J., van Oers, L. F. C. M., Verboon, M. & van der Voet, E. Glob. Environ. Change 49, 106–115 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Murguía, D. I., Bringezu, S. & Schaldach, R. J. Environ. Manage. 180, 409–420 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sonter, L. J. et al. Nat. Commun. 8, 1013 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dellink, R., Chateau, J., Lanzi, E. & Magné, B. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 200–214 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kothari, A., Demaria, F. & Acosta, A. Development 57, 362–375 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kallis, G. et al. Annu. Rev. Env. Resour. 43, 291–316 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Millward-Hopkins, J., Steinberger, J. K., Rao, N. D. & Oswald, Y. Glob. Environ. Change 65, 102168 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Renn, J. The Evolution of Knowledge: Rethinking Science for the Anthropocene (Princeton Univ. Press, 2020).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Seidl, R. et al. Ambio 42, 5–12 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Toivanen, T. et al. Anthropocene Rev. 4, 183–198 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Mol and A. Beaulieu for engaging with drafts of this article, and H. Faller for editing the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Franssen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franssen, T., de Wilde, M. A clean energy future isn’t set in stone. Nat. Geosci. 14, 636–637 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00822-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00822-0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation