Skip to main content
Log in

Rethinking groundwater age

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Geoscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

It is commonly thought that old groundwater cannot be pumped sustainably, and that recently recharged groundwater is inherently sustainable. We argue that both old and young groundwaters can be used in physically sustainable or unsustainable ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Flow of water and distribution of ages in a groundwater system in an arid region.

References

  1. Bethke, C. M. & Johnson, T. M. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 36, 121–152 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bierkens, M. F. & Wada, Y. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 063002 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Margat, J., Foster, S. & Droubi, A. in Non-Renewable Groundwater Resources: A Guidebook on Socially-Sustainable Management for Water-Policy Makers (eds Foster, S. & Loucks, D. P.) 13–24 (UNESCO, 2006).

  4. de Jong, M., Moran, J. E. & Visser, A. Quat. Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2019.04.008 (2019).

  5. Gleeson, T., Cuthbert, M., Ferguson, G. & Perrone, D. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 48, 431–463 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Döll, P. & Fiedler, K. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 4, 4069–4124 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bredehoeft, J. D. Groundwater 40, 340–345 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodell, M. et al. Nature 557, 651–659 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sturchio, N. C. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L05503 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McIntosh, J. C., Schlegel, M. E. & Person, M. Geofluids 12, 7–21 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bethke, C. M., Zhao, X. & Torgersen, T. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 104, 12999–13011 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuthbert, M. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 137–141 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zinn, B. A. & Konikow, L. F. Water Resour. Res. 43, W06418 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suckow, A. Appl. Geochem. 50, 222–230 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jasechko, S. et al. Nat. Geosci. 10, 425–429 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dillon, P. et al. Hydrogeol. J. 27, 1–30 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Global Water Futures grant to G.F. and J.C.M. and an NSERC Discovery Grant to G.F. J.C.M acknowledges funding received as a Fellow of the CIFAR Earth4D Subsurface Science and Exploration Program. M.O.C. acknowledges support under an Independent Research Fellowship from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC; NE/P017819/1). This commentary benefitted from discussions with P. Döll, J. Famiglietti, G. Fogg, X. Huggins, A. Manning, K. Markovich and M. Rohde.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant Ferguson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferguson, G., Cuthbert, M.O., Befus, K. et al. Rethinking groundwater age. Nat. Geosci. 13, 592–594 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0629-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0629-7

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation