Skip to main content
Log in

Economic modelling fit for the demands of energy decision makers

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Energy

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Decision makers need sector-specific, policy-focused, dynamic economic models with rich representations of technological progress. These allow them to understand how the energy transition is likely to unfold with different policies and what its impacts might be. A new generation of models is emerging to meet these demands, but more action is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Peñasco, C., Anadón, L. D. & Verdolini, E. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 257–265 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Economic Report to the President (Council of Economic Advisors, 2022); https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/ERP-2022.pdf

  3. Serafeim, G. Risks and Opportunities from the Transition to a Low Carbon Economy: A Business Analysis Framework Technical Note 123-014 (Harvard Business School, 2022).

  4. The Impact of Climate Change on the UK Insurance Sector: A Climate Change Adaptation Report by the Prudential Regulation Authority (Bank of England, 2015); https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/prudential-regulation/publication/impact-of-climate-change-on-the-uk-insurance-sector.pdf

  5. Mercure, J. F. et al. Energy Strat. Rev. 20, 195–208 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mercure, J. F. et al. Nat. Energy 6, 1133–1143 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bailie, A. et al. Renew. Sustain. Energy Trans. 4, 100061 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Way, R., Ives, M. C., Mealy, P. & Farmer, J. D. Joule 6, 2057–2082 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berryman, A. et al. Modelling labour market transitions: The case of productivity shifts in Brazil. In New Economic Models of Energy Innovation and Transition (EEIST, 2023); https://eeist.co.uk/eeist-reports/new-economic-models-of-energy-innovation-and-transition/

  10. Lamperti, F., Dosi, G., Napoletano, M., Roventini, A. & Sapio, A. Technol. Forecast. Social Change 153, 119806 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Methodologies and Considerations for Integrating the Physical and Transition Risks of Climate Change into Macroeconomic Forecasting for the President’s Budget (Council of Economic Advisors, 2023); https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/CEA-OMB-White-Paper.pdf

  12. Strachan, N., Fais, B. & Daly, H. Reinventing the energy modelling–policy interface. Nat. Energy 1, 16012 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietz, S. & Hepburn, C. Energy Econ. 40, 61–71 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nemet, G. How Solar Energy Became Cheap: A Model for Low-carbon Innovation (Routledge, 2019).

  15. Mercure, J. F. et al. Glob. Environ. Change 70, 102359 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pete Barbrook-Johnson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barbrook-Johnson, P., Mercure, JF., Sharpe, S. et al. Economic modelling fit for the demands of energy decision makers. Nat Energy 9, 229–231 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01452-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01452-7

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation