Skip to main content
Log in

A broader cultural view is necessary to study the evolution of sexual orientation

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Ecology & Evolution

View current issue Submit your manuscript

The causation of sexual orientation is likely to be complex and influenced by multiple factors. We advocate incorporating a broader cultural view into evolutionary and genetic studies to account for differences in how sexual orientation is experienced, expressed and understood in both humans and nonhuman animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ganna, A. et al. Science 365, eaat7693 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sommer, V. & Vasey, P. Homosexual Behaviour in Animals: Evolutionary Perspectives (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006).

  3. Bailey, N. W. & Zuk, M. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 439–446 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Savolainen, V. & Hodgson, J. A. in Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Sciences (eds Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A.) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3403-1 (Springer International, 2016).

  5. Dauwalder, B., Tsujimoto, S., Moss, J. & Mattox, W. Genes Dev. 16, 2879–2892 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Grosjean, Y., Grillet, M., Augustin, H., Ferveur, J.-F. & Featherstone, D. E. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 54–61 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mizumoto, N., Bourguignon, T. & Bailey, B. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 19, e2212401119 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Salia, S. et al. Brain Behav. Immun. Health 30, 100637 (2023).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Clive, J., Flintham, E. & Savolainen, V. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1287–1301 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vasey, P. L. Arch. Sex. Behav. 31, 51–62 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jabbour, J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 18369–18377 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Minturn, L., Grosse, M. & Haider, S. Ethnology 8, 301–318 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barthes, J., Crochet, P. A. & Raymond, M. PLoS ONE 10, e0134817 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Young, L. C., Zaun, B. J. & Vanderwerf, E. A. Biol. Lett. 4, 323–325 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin, J. et al. Biol. Psychiatry 89, 1127–1137 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zietsch, B. P. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 1251–1258 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zietsch, B. P. et al. Evol. Hum. Behav. 29, 424–433 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Song, S. & Zhang, J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2303418120 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rice, W. R., Friberg, U. & Gavrilets, S. Q. Rev. Biol. 87, 343–368 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bocklandt, S., Horvath, S., Vilain, E. & Hamer, D. H. Hum. Genet. 118, 691–694 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rice, W. R., Friberg, U. & Gavrilets, S. BioEssays 35, 764–770 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chivers, M. L. Arch. Sex. Behav. 46, 1161–1179 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Diamond, L. Sexual Fluidity: Understanding Women’s Love and Desire (Harvard University Press, 2009).

  24. Verweij, K. J. H. et al. Behav. Genet. 38, 257–265 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Rahman, Q., Xu, Y., Lippa, R. A. & Vasey, P. L. Arch. Sex. Behav. 49, 595–606 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vasey, P. L. & VanderLaan, D. P. Psychol. Sci. 21, 292–297 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gómez Jiménez, F. R. & Vasey, P. L. Evol. Hum. Behav. 43, 224–233 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants of a Royal Society–Theo Murphy scientific meeting on ‘Genetics and evolution of sexual orientation’ (27–28 March 2023) for the lively discussion that initiated this Comment; G. Rieger and P. Vasey for comments on the manuscript; and the Royal Society, the American Institute of Bisexuality and the Evolution Education Trust for funding. For the purpose of open access, the corresponding author has applied a ‘Creative Commons Attribution’ (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Savolainen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Thomas Dickins and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Savolainen, V., Bailey, N.W., Diamond, L. et al. A broader cultural view is necessary to study the evolution of sexual orientation. Nat Ecol Evol 8, 181–183 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02273-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02273-9

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation