References
Scholes, R. J. & Biggs, R. Nature 434, 45–49 (2005).
Newbold, T. et al. Science 353, 288–291 (2016).
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2018–2 (IUCN, 2019); http://www.iucnredlist.org
Purvis, A., De Palma, A. & Newbold, T. in State of Nature 2016 (eds Hayhow, D.vB. et al.) 70–71 (The State of Nature Partnership, London, 2016).
Erb, K.-H. et al. Nature 553, 73–76 (2018).
Lennox, G. D. et al. Glob. Chang. Biol. 24, 5680–5694 (2018).
Venter, O. et al. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2015).
Di Marco, M., Venter, O., Possingham, H. P. & Watson, J. E. M. Nat. Commun. 9, 4621 (2018).
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).
Olson, D. M. et al. Bioscience 51, 933–938 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, P.A., Green, R.E. & Balmford, A. The biodiversity intactness index may underestimate losses. Nat Ecol Evol 3, 862–863 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0895-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0895-1
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The bii4africa dataset of faunal and floral population intactness estimates across Africa’s major land uses
Scientific Data (2024)
-
Land and deep-sea mining: the challenges of comparing biodiversity impacts
Biodiversity and Conservation (2023)
-
Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy
Nature (2020)
-
Reply to ‘The biodiversity intactness index may underestimate losses’
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2019)