Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Defuse the dilution effect debate

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Ecology & Evolution

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Debate surrounding the dilution effect hypothesis in disease ecology has reached such intensity that it is stymying further research. Yet collaborative progress is important for human health and biodiversity conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ostfeld, R. S. & Keesing, F. Can. J. Zool. 78, 2061–2078 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ostfeld, R. S. & Keesing, F. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 43, 157–182 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Keesing, F. et al. Ecol. Lett. 9, 485–498 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Keesing, F. et al. Nature 468, 547–652 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lafferty, K. S. & Wood, C. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 503–504 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wood, C. L. et al. Ecology 95, 817–832 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roberts, M. G. & Hesteerbeek, J. A. B. J. R. Soc. Interface 15, 1–10 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Strauss, A. et al. Ecol. Lett. 18, 916–926 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hough, R. L. Biodivers. Conserv. 23, 267–288 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Civitello, D. J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8667–8671 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kilpatrick, A. M. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 372, 20160131 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Randolph, S. E. & Dobson, A. D. M. Parasitology 139, 847–863 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Venesky, M. D. et al. J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 557–565 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Strauss, A. T. et al. Ecol. Monogr. 86, 393–411 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stokstad, E. Science 329, 1272–1273 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hosseini, P. R. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 372, 20160129 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kennedy, T. A. et al. Nature 417, 636–638 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hillebrand, H. Am. Nat. 163, 192–211 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hechinger, R. F. & Lafferty, K. D. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1059–1066 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson, P. T. & et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16916–16921 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gómez, A. & Nichols, E. Int. J. Parasitol. 2, 222–227 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samniqueka Halsey.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Halsey, S. Defuse the dilution effect debate. Nat Ecol Evol 3, 145–146 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0764-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0764-3

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation