References
Gendron, C. M. et al. Science 343, 544–548 (2014).
Harvanek, Z. M. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0152 (2017).
Apfeld, J. & Kenyon, C. Nature 402, 804–809 (1999).
Libert, S. et al. Science 315, 1133–1137 (2007).
Linford, N. J., Kuo, T. H., Chan, T. P. & Pletcher, S. D. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 759–785 (2011).
Darwin, C. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (John Murray, London, 1871).
Tatar, M. & Promislow, D. E. L. Evolution 51, 1323–1326 (1997).
Schuster, S. M. & Wade, M. J. Mating Systems and Strategies (Princeton-MBE, Princeton, 2003).
Agrawal, A. F. Nature 411, 692–695 (2001).
Prokop, Z. M. et al. Evolution 71, 650–661 (2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.C. conceived the idea. P.C., R.G.-R., Z.S. and M.S. further developed the theory. P.C. wrote the paper with contributions from R.G.-R., Z.S. and M.S.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carazo, P., García-Roa, R., Sultanova, Z. et al. Perception costs of reproduction can magnify sexual selection. Nat Ecol Evol 1, 1414–1415 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0312-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0312-6
- Springer Nature Limited