Skip to main content
Log in

Event attribution is ready to inform loss and damage negotiations

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Climate Change

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Extreme weather event attribution techniques quantify anthropogenic contributions to extreme weather disasters, but recently it was argued they are not yet ready to inform decisions on loss and damage funding. Here, we assert that they can substantially help formulate allocations to impacted vulnerable countries for the most damaging extreme events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: EEA within the loss and damage process.

References

  1. King, A. D. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 415–417 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Newman, R. & Noy, I. Nat. Commun. 14, 6103 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Atlas of Mortality and Economic Losses from Weather, Climate and Water Extremes (1970–2019) (WMO, 2021).

  4. Clarke, B., Otto, F. & Jones, R. Climatic Change 176, 60 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frame, D. et al. Climatic Change 162, 781–797 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vicedo-Cabrera, A. M. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 492–500 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S. E. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 024009 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smiley, K. et al. Nat. Commun. 13, 3418 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrage, L. & Nordhaus, W. Policies, Projections, and the Social Cost of Carbon: Results from the DICE-2023 Model (NBER, 2023).

  10. Nkiaka, E. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 123003 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ding, Y. et al. Agric. Water Manag. 255, 106996 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Patricola, C. M. & Wehner, M. F. Nature 563, 339–346 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Strauss, B. H. et al. Nat. Commun. 12, 2720 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Knutson, T. et al. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 1987–2007 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Otto, F. E. L. et al. Environ. Res. Clim. 2, 25001 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kay, A. L. et al. J. Hydrol. 406, 97–112 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van Oldenborgh, G. J. et al. Earths Future 10, e2021EF002271 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wehner, M. et al. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 97, S81–S86 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I.N., D.S., S.R., D.F. and R.N. were supported by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment through the Whakahura Endeavour project. M.W. was supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the US Department of Energy under contract no. DE340AC02-05CH11231 as part of the Regional and Global Model Analysis program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilan Noy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noy, I., Wehner, M., Stone, D. et al. Event attribution is ready to inform loss and damage negotiations. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 1279–1281 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01865-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01865-4

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation