Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incorporating dead material in ecosystem assessments and projections

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Climate Change

View current issue Submit your manuscript

When considering how ecosystems will react to climate change the importance of dead matter has been largely overlooked. Here we discuss why dead material is integral to ecosystem form and function, and why its persistence or degradation must be explicitly included in models considering ecosystem futures in a rapidly changing world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Concept image of varied impacts of different climate stressors.

References

  1. Stokland, J. N., Siitonen, J. & Jonsson, B. G. Biodiversity in Dead Wood (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).

  2. Turetsky, M. R. et al. Nat. Geosci. 8, 11–14 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wenger, S. J., Subalusky, A. L. & Freeman, M. C. Food Webs 18, e00106 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tomatsuri, M. & Kon, K. Hydrobiologia 790, 225–232 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Henry, L. A. & Roberts, J. M. in Marine Animal Forests (eds Rossi, S. et al.) 235–256 (Springer, 2017).

  6. Walton, M. E. M. et al. Sci. Total Environ. 820, 153191 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolfe, K., Kenyon, T. M. & Mumby, P. J. Coral Reefs 40, 1769–1806 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, H. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 6180–6193 (2022).

  9. Jackson, R. B. et al. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48, 419–445 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pan, Y. et al. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hedges, J. I., Keil, R. G. & Benner, R. Org. Geochem. 27, 195–212 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lønborg, C. et al. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 466 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Harden, J. W. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 6, 174–184 (2000).

  14. Davidson, E. A. & Janssens, I. A. Nature 440, 165–173 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hugelius, G. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 20438–20446 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hennige, S. J. et al. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00668 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolfram, U. et al. Sci. Rep. 12, 8052 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts, J. M., Wheeler, A. J. & Freiwald, A. Science 312, 543–547 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mortensen, P. B. & Fosså, J. H. Species diversity and spatial distribution of invertebrates on deep-water Lophelia reefs in Norway. In Proc. 10th Int. Coral Reef Symp. 1849–1868 (ICRS, 2006).

  20. Maier, S. R. et al. Deep Sea Res. I 175, 103574 (2021)..

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to manuscript conceptualization. K.A.B. led initial draft and figure preparation, and all authors contributed to manuscript writing, editing and reviewing. U.W. and S.H. contributed equally.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian J. Hennige.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barnhill, K.A., Roberts, J.M., Myers-Smith, I. et al. Incorporating dead material in ecosystem assessments and projections. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 113–115 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01565-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01565-5

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation