Despite the growing clinical use of radium in cancer treatments, the fundamental chemistry of nature’s largest +2 cation remains largely unexplored. Now, structural analysis of a radium complex reveals that its behaviour cannot always be predicted from the chemistry of its closest nonradioactive congener, barium.
References
Yamaguchi, A. et al. iScience 25, 104763 (2022).
Bai, Z. et al. Inorg. Chem. 62, 8478–8481 (2023).
White, F. D., Thiele, N. A., Simms, M. E. & Cary, S. K. Nat. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01366-z (2023).
Abou, D. S. et al. Chem. Sci. 12, 3733–3742 (2021).
Henriksen, G., Hoff, P. & Larsen, R. H. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 56, 667–671 (2002).
Ivanov, A. S. et al. Chem. Comm. 58, 9938–9941 (2022).
Brown, P. L., Matyskin, A. V. & Ekberg, C. Radiochim. Acta 110, 505–513 (2022).
Shannon, R. D. Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 751–767 (1976).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woods, J.J., Abergel, R.J. Doing away with radium’s proxies. Nat. Chem. 16, 147–148 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01426-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01426-4
- Springer Nature Limited