Skip to main content
Log in

Space science with CubeSats and nanosatellites

  • Perspective
  • Published:

From Nature Astronomy

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

At the dawn of the space age, nanosatellites, weighing between 1 and 10 kg, were used because of launcher limitations. In the past twenty years, a renaissance has occurred as a consequence of the success of microsatellites in accessing auxiliary and piggyback launch opportunities driving affordability. In addition, the capabilities and flight demonstrations of microelectronics components in orbit and the revolutionary CubeSat initiative have opened up a wealth of flight opportunities and stimulated an explosion in the supply chain. More recently, nanosatellite capabilities have been driven by the twin forces of commercial and scientific innovation. Commercial innovation has driven both the expectation and reality of reliable nanosatellites as companies build their businesses on the back of CubeSat manufacture; scientific innovation has stimulated the development of high-performance satellite payloads and subsystems. This Perspective reflects on the history and current state of the field, and offers a future outlook for nanosatellite science missions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: A jack-in-the-box launcher from Nanoracks capable of accommodating four 3U satellites.

Spire Global.

Fig. 2: A Venn diagram showing the overlap between nanosatellites and CubeSats.
Fig. 3

NASA/JPL-Caltech

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall, R. C. Origins and development of the Vanguard and Explorer satellite programs. Air Power Historian 11, 101–112 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz, N. et al. Laboratory demonstration of an active optics system for high-resolution deployable CubeSat. In Proc. The 4S Symposium (ESA, 2018).

  3. Smith, M. W. et al. On-orbit results and lessons learned from the ASTERIA space telescope mission. In Proc. 32nd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites SSC18-I-08 (AIAA, USU, 2018).

  4. Pong, C. M. On-orbit performance & operation of the attitude & pointing control subsystems on ASTERIA. In Proc. 32nd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites SSC18-PI-34 (AIAA, USU, 2018).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Douglas Liddle.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare the following competing interests: they are employed by In-Space Missions Limited to develop new space missions and provide consultancy and procurement support to the space industry.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liddle, J.D., Holt, A.P., Jason, S.J. et al. Space science with CubeSats and nanosatellites. Nat Astron 4, 1026–1030 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-01247-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-01247-2

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation