Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Safeguarding natural forests through the voluntary REDD+ scheme

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Plants

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Over 100 of the world’s leaders pledged to end deforestation by 2030 at the COP26 climate summit in a bid to limit global warming to 1.5 °C. The REDD+ scheme is the best hope to achieving this target.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1: A snapshot of current and projected future deforestation in the global south.
Fig. 2: An overview of REDD+ theory of change and transformation over time.

References

  1. Pacheco, P. et al. Deforestation fronts: Drivers and Responses in a Changing World (WWF, 2021).

  2. Gardner, T. A. et al. Ecol. Lett. 12, 561–582 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pan, Y. et al. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonham, C. A., Sacayon, E. & Tzi, E. Biodivers. Conserv. 17, 1581–1593 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sylvera Carbon Credit Ratings: Frameworks & Processes (Sylvera Ltd, 2022).

  6. The Kasigau Corridor REDD Project Phase 1 — Rukinga Sanctuary: Project Document for Validation: Using the Voluntary Carbon Standard (VCS) 2007.1 / Sectoral Scope 14 VM0009 Methodology for Avoided Mosaic Deforestation of Tropical Forests Version 9 (Wildlife Works Carbon LLC, 2011).

  7. Bernard, F., Minang, P. A., Adkins, B. & Freund, J. T. Clim. Policy 14, 788–800 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. The Kasigau Corridor REDD Project Phase 1 — Rukinga Sanctuary: 6th Monitoring Report (M6) CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 (Wildlife Works Carbon LLC, 2020).

  9. The Southern Cardamom REDD+ Project — Monitoring and Implementation Report Summary: Sustainable Development Verified Impact Standard (Wildlife Works Carbon LLC, 2021).

  10. Gray, T. N. et al. Cambodian J. Nat. Hist. 38–48 (2017).

  11. Ken, S., Entani, T., Tsusaka, T. W. & Sasaki, N. Heliyon 6, e03802 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beauchamp, E., Clements, T. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Land Use Policy 71, 431–444 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen, M. C. et al. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Protected Planet. World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) (IUCN & UNEP, 2022); https://www.protectedplanet.net/en

  15. Cambodia National REDD+ Strategy 2017–2026 (The Kingdom of Cambodia, 2017); http://redd.unfccc.int/files/20180813_national_redd.strategy_cambodia.pdf

  16. Travers, H., Winney, K., Clements, T., Evans, T. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Land Use Policy 43, 186–196 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. West, T. A., Börner, J., Sills, E. O. & Kontoleon, A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 24188–24194 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Public Consultation: Updates to VCS Avoiding Unplanned Deforestation and Degradation (AUDD) Methodologies. Verra https://verra.org/public-consultation-updates-to-vcs-avoiding-unplanned-deforestation-and-degradation-audd-methodologies/ (2022).

  19. Phelps, J., Webb, E. L. & Agrawal, A. Science 328, 312–313 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Guerra, R. & Moutinho, P. Forests 11, 1012 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Myers, R. et al. Global Environ. Chang. 50, 314–324 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Media Statement: Suruí Forest Carbon Project. Verra https://verra.org/media-statement-surui-forest-carbon-project/ (2018).

  23. Climate Math: What a 1.5-degree pathway would take. McKinsey Quarterly https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/interactive-the-1-point-5-degree-challenge?cid=other-eml-alt-mip-mck&hlkid=9082cfe687ee49f2abd0d7c15faf8279&hctky=12328062&hdpid=51a693a8-d384-4101-b4dc-2736fd533882 (2020).

  24. Rowlands, C. Unprecedented private sector finance deal to generate over $2bn to protect threatened forests, wildlife, and improve community livelihoods. Hartree Solutions https://www.hartreesolutions.com/market-insights/unprecedented-private-sector-finance-deal-to-generate-over-2bn-to-protect-threatened-forests-wildlife-and-improve-community-livelihoods/ (2021).

  25. Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Article 6.5, TIAS No. 16–1104 (UNFCCC, 2015).

  26. CBL Nature-Based Global Emissions Offset. N-GEO. Venue: GLOBEX (NGOG2). (CME Group, 2022); https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/energy/emissions/cbl-nature-based-global-emissions-offset.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Project Impacts, Everland LLC, New York, NY, USA

    Maren Pauly & Josh Tosteson

Authors
  1. Maren Pauly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Josh Tosteson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maren Pauly.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors report that they are employed at a company (Everland LLC) that may be affected by the research reported in the enclosed paper as they work with the developers of REDD+ projects.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary_Material_Nature_Plants_final_submission

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pauly, M., Tosteson, J. Safeguarding natural forests through the voluntary REDD+ scheme. Nat. Plants 8, 861–866 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01208-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01208-9

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation