Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Nagoya Protocol and historical collections of plants

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Plants

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Keeping pace with food demand and climate change requires continuous genetic improvement of crops that, in turn, relies on the availability of genetic resources. Access to these resources is complicated by the need to establish benefit-sharing arrangements when accessing and using such genetic resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Nagoya compliance for historical plant material.

References

  1. Henry, R. J. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. (in the press).

  2. Xiao, J. H. et al. Nature 384, 223–224 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsioumani, E. J. World Intellect. Prop. 21, 106–122 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson, D. F. Biodiversity, Access and Benefit-Sharing: Global Case Studies (Taylor & Francis, 2015).

  5. The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (United Nations, 2011).

  6. Morgera, E., Tsioumani, E. & Matthias, B. Unravelling the Nagoya Protocol: A Commentary on the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing to the Convention on Biological Diversity (Brill, 2014).

  7. Lassen, B. et al. The Two Worlds of Nagoya—ABS Legislation in the EU and Provider Countries: Discrepancies and how to deal with them (Public Eye and Natural Justice, 2016).

  8. Nijar, G.-S., Louafi, S. & Welch, E.-W. Int. Environ. Agreem.-P 17, 607–621 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kursar, T. A. BioScience 61, 256–257 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson, D. F. & von Braun, J. in New Challenges for the Nagoya Protocol (eds Correa, C. & Seuba, X.) 377–403 (Springer, 2019).

  11. von Braun, J. & Meienberg, F. Access or Utilisation—What Triggers User Obligations? (Public Eye and Natural Justice, 2013).

  12. von Braun, J. & Brack, D. BioRes. 7, 3 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Off. J. Eur. Union 150, 59–71 (2014).

  14. Kamau, E. C. & Winter, G. LEAD 9, 106–126 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Greiber, T. Phytomedicine 53, 313–318 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nature Diversity Act Ministry of the Environment https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/nature-diversity-act/id570549/ (2009).

  17. Tvedt, M. W. & Fauchald, O. K. J. World Intellect. Prop. 14, 383–402 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. SA Government. National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act Report No. 26436 (Government Gazette, 2004).

  19. Jansen, L. in The Indigenous World 455–462 (2016).

  20. Schaeffer, V. Res. Policy 48, 103824 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. FAOSTAT data https://doi.org/http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (FAO, 2020).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.S. and R.J.H. conceived and conducted the study and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert James Henry.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sherman, B., Henry, R.J. The Nagoya Protocol and historical collections of plants. Nat. Plants 6, 430–432 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0657-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0657-8

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation