Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Rethinking the urgency priority system in round hole detachments, which should be done first? Macula on or macula off.

  • Comment
  • Published:
Eye Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1: Demonstrating a single round hole as an incidental finding referral to our clinic.

References

  1. Byer NE. The natural history asymptomatic retinal breaks. Opthamolgy. 1982;89:1033–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ung T, Comer MB, Ang AJ, Sheard R, Lee C, Poulson AV, et al. Clinical features and surgical management of retinal detachment secondary to round retinal holes. Eye. 2005;19:665–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sultan ZN, Agorogiannis EI, Iannetta D, Steel D, Sandinha T. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a review of current practice in diagnosis and management. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020;5:e000474.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Williamson T, Shunmugam M, Rodrigues I, Dogramci M, Lee E. Characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and their relationship to visual outcome. Eye. 2013;27:1063–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Grabowska A, Neffendorf JE, Yorston D, Williamson T. Urgency of retinal detachment repair: is it time to re-think our priorities? Eye. 2021;35:1035–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vitreo-Retinal Department, Birmingham Midlands Eye Unit, Birmingham City Hospital, Birmingham, UK

    A. Javed, M. O. Qadir, S. Lee, A. Mitra, A. Tyagi, A. Sharma, K. Lett & S. Ch’ng

Authors
  1. A. Javed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. O. Qadir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Mitra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Tyagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. K. Lett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. S. Ch’ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AJ thought of the study and compiled the manuscript, MOQ and SL contributed to editing the manuscript. AM, AT, AS, KL and SC reviewed the final manuscript, discussed and fed back to AJ to make changes and contributed their personal experiences and ideas to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Javed.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Javed, A., Qadir, M.O., Lee, S. et al. Rethinking the urgency priority system in round hole detachments, which should be done first? Macula on or macula off.. Eye 38, 1407–1408 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-02930-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-02930-8

  • Springer Nature Limited

Search

Navigation