Skip to main content
Log in

Osteoarthritis

In search of phenotypes

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Rheumatology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Identifying different phenotypes of osteoarthritis is currently a subject of much research; however, a new systematic review has sparked discussion about the discrepancies in how research into disease phenotypes is conducted. Can we define individual phenotypes if we cannot agree on what constitutes a phenotype in the first place?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Defining phenotypes of osteoarthritis based on dimensions of disease.

References

  1. Felson, D. T. Identifying different osteoarthritis phenotypes through epidemiology. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18, 601–604 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Deveza, L. A. et al. Knee osteoarthritis phenotypes and their relevance for outcomes: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2017.08.009 (2017).

  3. Dell'Isola, A. et al. Identification of clinical phenotypes in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 17, 425 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bastick, A. N. et al. Prognostic factors for progression of clinical osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies. Arthritis Res. Ther. 17, 152 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bastick, A. N. et al. What are the prognostic factors for radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 473, 2969–2989 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. & Verhagen, A. P. Osteoarthritis subpopulations and implications for clinical trial design. Arthritis Res. Ther. 13, 213 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Middelkoop, M. et al. The OA Trial Bank: meta-analysis of individual patient data from knee and hip osteoarthritis trials show that patients with severe pain exhibit greater benefit from intra-articular glucocorticoids. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 24, 1143–1152 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun, X. et al. Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review. BMJ 344, e1553 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McAlindon, T. E. et al. OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: design, conduct, and reporting of clinical trials for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 23, 747–760 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sita M. Bierma-Zeinstra.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.M.B-Z. declares that she has received consultancy fees from InFirst Healthcare and Regeneron. M.v.M. declares no competing interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bierma-Zeinstra, S., van Middelkoop, M. In search of phenotypes. Nat Rev Rheumatol 13, 705–706 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2017.181

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2017.181

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation