Skip to main content
Log in

Gene therapy

Gene-editing therapy for neurological disease

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Neurology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Guide RNA-mediated CRISPR–Cas nucleases are a powerful technology for the engineering of mammalian genomes. CRISPR–Cas9-dependent editing of mutated genes that cause Huntington disease and fragile X syndrome was recently achieved in cell-based models, heralding the first step towards developing this technology into viable therapeutics for neurological diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: CRISPR–Cas9-based gene editing.

References

  1. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Santoro, M. R., Bray, S. M. & Warren, S. T. Molecular mechanisms of fragile X syndrome: a twenty-year perspective. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 7, 219–245 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Park, C.-Y. et al. Reversion of FMR1 methylation and silencing by editing the triplet repeats in fragile X iPSC-derived neurons. Cell Rep. 13, 234–241 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Xie, N. et al. Reactivation of FMR1 by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of the expanded CGG-repeat of the fragile X chromosome. PLoS ONE 11, e0165499 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shin, J. W. et al. Permanent inactivation of Huntington's disease mutation by personalized allele-specific CRISPR/Cas9. Hum. Mol. Genet. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddw286 (2016).

  7. Cox, D. B., Platt, R. J. & Zhang, F. Therapeutic genome editing: prospects and challenges. Nat. Med. 21, 121–131 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Foust, K. D. et al. Therapeutic AAV9-mediated suppression of mutant SOD1 slows disease progression and extends survival in models of inherited ALS. Mol. Ther. 21, 2148–2159 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahdar, M. et al. Synthetic CRISPR RNA–Cas9-guided genome editing in human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E7110–E7117 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, R. A. et al. Antisense oligonucleotide therapy for neurodegenerative disease. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 2290–2296 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.A.M. and D.W.C. receive salary support from the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Don W. Cleveland.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D.W.C. has been a consultant for Ionis Pharmaceuticals since 2003. M.A.M. declares no competing interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McMahon, M., Cleveland, D. Gene-editing therapy for neurological disease. Nat Rev Neurol 13, 7–9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.190

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.190

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation