Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Infectious disease

Diagnostic criteria for neurocysticercosis — a difficult update

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Neurology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

A recent study proposed a modified version of the current diagnostic criteria for neurocysticercosis, but the value of the modifications is unclear and the study design limits conclusions about the validity of the new criteria. Instead, the suggested changes might contribute to future revision of the existing diagnostic criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Coyle, C. M. et al. Neurocysticercosis: neglected but not forgotten. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 6, e1500 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carpio, A. et al. New diagnostic criteria for neurocysticercosis: reliability and validity. Ann. Neurol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.24732 (2016).

  3. Del Brutto, O. H. et al. Proposal of diagnostic criteria for human cysticercosis and neurocysticercosis. J. Neurol. Sci. 142, 1–6 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Del Brutto, O. H. et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for neurocysticercosis. Neurology. 57, 177–183 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nash, T. E., Garcia, H. H., Rajshekhar, V. & Del Brutto, O. H. in WHO/FAO/OIE Guidelines for the Surveillance, Prevention and Control of Taeniosis/Cysticercosis. (ed. Murrell, K. D.) 11–25 (OIE/WHO/FAO, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carpio, A. Commentary. J. Neurosci. Rural Pract. 5, S92–S93 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodriguez, S., Wilkins, P. & Dorny, P. Immunological and molecular diagnosis of cysticercosis. Pathog. Glob. Health 106, 286–298 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahale, R. R., Mehta, A. & Rangasetty, S. Extraparenchymal (racemose) neurocysticercosis and its multitude manifestations: a comprehensive review. J. Clin. Neurol. 11, 203–211 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Troiani, C., Lopes, C. C., Scardovelli, C. A. & Nai, G. A. Cystic brain metastases radiologically simulating neurocysticercosis. Sao Paulo Med. J. 129, 352–356 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bick, B. L., Haji, S., Laughlin, R. S., Watson, R. E. & Kumar, N. Metastatic breast cancer suggesting parasitic disease. Neurology. 79, 2366 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert H. Gilman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author participated in the 2001 update of the Del Brutto diagnostic criteria for neurocysticercosis and in further revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gilman, R. Diagnostic criteria for neurocysticercosis — a difficult update. Nat Rev Neurol 12, 560–561 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.145

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.145

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation