Skip to main content
Log in

Pancreatic cancer

FDG-PET is not useful in early pancreatic cancer diagnosis

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Better tools for early detection and accurate staging of pancreatic cancer are needed. The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET in this setting is controversial. The results of a large retrospective study analyzing the value of FDG-PET in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are discussed here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Tempero, M. A. et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2012: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J. Natl Compr. Canc. Netw. 10, 703–713 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Friess, H. et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by 2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography. Gut 36, 771–777 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tang, S. et al. Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET, combined FDG-PET/CT and EUS in diagnosing primary pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Radiol. 78, 142–150 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsumoto, I. et al. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography does not aide in diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.033.

  5. Dibble, E. H. et al. PET/CT of cancer patients: part 1, pancreatic neoplasms. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 199, 952–967 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamisawa, T. et al. FDG-PET/CT findings of autoimmune pancreatitis. Hepatogastroenterology 57, 447–450 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hartwig, W. et al. CA19–9 in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: perspective to adjust surgical and perioperative therapy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2809–1.

  8. Kittaka, H. et al. Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in predicting the pathologic response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy in patients with resectable T3 pancreatic cancer. World J. Surg. 37, 169–178 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cameron, K. et al. Recurrent pancreatic carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Abdom. Imaging 36, 463–471 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Treglia, G., Castaldi, P., Rindi, G., Giordano, A. & Rufini, V. Diagnostic performance of Gallium-68 somatostatin receptor PET and PET/CT in patients with thoracic and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a meta-analysis. Endocrine 42, 80–87 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus W. Büchler.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strobel, O., Büchler, M. FDG-PET is not useful in early pancreatic cancer diagnosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10, 203–205 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.42

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.42

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation