Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hematology

The case against rituximab maintenance

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

A Correction to this article was published on 01 December 2009

The monoclonal antibody, rituximab, is used to treat lymphomas. This article discusses the results of randomized trials that suggest patients with follicular lymphoma should not receive rituximab maintenance therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Hainsworth, J. D. et al. Single-agent rituximab as first-line and maintenance treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma: a phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. J. Clin. Oncol. 21, 1746–1751 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghielmini, M. et al. Prolonged treatment with rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma significantly increases event-free survival and response duration compared with weekly ×4 schedule. Blood 103, 4416–4423 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hochster, H. et al. Maintenance rituximab after cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone prolongs progession-free survival in advanced indolent lymphoma: results of the randomized phase III ECOG1496 study. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 1607–1614 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Forstpointner, R. et al. Maintenance therapy with rituximab leads to a significant prolongation of response duration after salvage therapy with a combination of rituximab, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and mitoxantrone (R-FCM) in patients with recurring and refractory follicular and mantle cell lymphomas: results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG). Blood 108, 4003–4008 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Oers, M. H. et al. Rituximab maintenance improves clinical outcome of relapsed/refractory follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in patients both with and without rituximab during induction: results of a prospective randomized phase III intergroup trial. Blood 108, 3295–3301 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Oers, M. H. J. et al. Rituximab maintenance treatment of relapsed/resistant follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: long-term outcome of the EORTC 20981 phase III randomized intergroup study [abstract 836]. Blood 112, 309–310 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vidal, L. et al. Rituximab maintenance for the treatment of patients with follicular lymphma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 101, 248–255 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hainsworth, J. D. et al. Maximizing therapeutic benefit of rituximab: maintenance therapy versus retreatment at progression in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 1088–1095 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Habermann, T. M. et al. Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 24, 3121–3127 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morschhauser, F. et al. Phase III trial of consolidation therapy with 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan compared with no additional therapy after first remission in advanced follicular lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 5156–5164 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce D. Cheson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

B. Cheson is a Consultant for Celgene, Roche and Genetech and is on the Speakers' Bureau for Celgene.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheson, B. The case against rituximab maintenance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6, 622–624 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.161

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.161

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation