Skip to main content
Log in

Of cancer and cave fish

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Cancer

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Abstract

We propose that the drivers of carcinogenesis lie more in the adaptive changes that are enabled by local or systemic alterations of tissue architecture than in the genetic changes observed in cancer cells. A full understanding of cancer biology and therapy through a cataloguing of the cancer genome is unlikely unless it is integrated into an evolutionary and ecological context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Wilkens, H. Convergent adaptations to cave life in the Rhamdia laticauda catfish group (Pimelodidai, Teleostei). Env. Bio. Fishes 62, 251–261 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Humphreys, W. F. Milyeringa veritas (Eleotridae), a remarkably versatile cave fish from the arid tropics of northwestern Australia. Env. Biol. Fishes 62, 297–313 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, Z., Gan, X. & He, S. Distinct evolutionary patterns between two duplicated color vision genes within cyprinid fishes. J. Mol. Evol. 69, 346–359 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jeffery, W. R. Regressive evolution in Astyanax cavefish. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43, 25–47 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Niven, J. E. & Laughlin, S. B. Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 1792–1804 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Borowsky, R. Restoring sight in blind cavefish. Curr. Biol. 18, R23–R24 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Behrens, M., Wilkens, H. & Schmale, H. Cloning of the αA-crystallin genes of a blind cave form and the epigean form of Astyanax fasciatus: a comparative analysis of structure, expression and evolutionary conservation. Gene 216, 319–326 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Borowsky, R. & Wilkens, H. Mapping a cavefish genome: polygenic systems and regressive evolution. J. Hered. 93, 19–21 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gatenby, R. A., Gillies, R. J. & Brown, J. S. The evolutionary dynamics of cancer prevention. Nature Rev. Cancer 10, 526–527 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubin, H. Saturation density of skin fibroblasts as a quantitative screen for human cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epid. Bio. Prev. 18, 2366–2372 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell, W. A. & Valone, T. J. The optimization research program: studying adaptations by their function. Q. Rev. Biol. 65, 43–52 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenberg, A. The supervenience of biologic concepts. Phil. Sci. 363–386 (1978).

  13. Rosenberg, A. The structure of Biological Science New York (Cambridge University Press, 1985).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Gatenby, R. A. & Gillies, R. J. A microenvironmental model of carcinogenesis. Nature Rev. Cancer 8, 56–61 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Grant Support: 1U54CA143970-01

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert A. Gatenby.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gatenby, R., Gillies, R. & Brown, J. Of cancer and cave fish. Nat Rev Cancer 11, 237–238 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3036

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3036

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation