Skip to main content
Log in

Stress and the brain: individual variability and the inverted-U

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Neuroscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

It is a truism that the brain influences the body and that peripheral physiology influences the brain. Never is this clearer than during stress, where the subtlest emotions or the most abstract thoughts can initiate stress responses, with consequences throughout the body, and the endocrine transducers of stress alter cognition, affect and behavior. For a fervent materialist, few things in life bring more pleasure than contemplating the neurobiology of stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Conceptualization of the inverted-U in the context of the benefits and costs of stress.

References

  1. McEwen, B. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1353–1363 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnsten, A.F. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1376–1385 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sorrells, S.F. et al. Neuron 64, 33–39 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hodes, G. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1386–1393 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tost, H. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1421–1431 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chatterji, S. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1364–1375 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holon, N. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1405–1412 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Calhoon, G. & Tye, K. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1394–1404 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hariri, A.R. & Holmes, A. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1347–1352 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Caspi, A. et al. Science 301, 386–389 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Diamond, D.M. et al. Hippocampus 2, 421–430 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McEwen, B.S. & Sapolsky, R. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 5, 205–216 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chrousos, G. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 5, 374–381 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baldi, E. & Bucherelli, C. Nonlinearity Biol. Toxicol. Med. 3, 9–21 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Luksys, G. & Sandi, C. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 502–508 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Prager, E. & Johnson, L. Sci. Signal. 2, re5 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roozendaal, B. Psychoneuroendocrinology 25, 213–238 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sapolsky, R.M., Romero, L. & Munck, A. Endocr. Rev. 21, 55–89 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fiorillo, C.D., Tobler, P. & Schultz, W. Science 299, 1898–1902 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Russo, S.J. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1475–1484 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M Sapolsky.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sapolsky, R. Stress and the brain: individual variability and the inverted-U. Nat Neurosci 18, 1344–1346 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4109

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4109

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation