Skip to main content
Log in

Transplantation reveals regional differences in oligodendrocyte differentiation in the adult brain

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature Neuroscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

To examine the role of gray and white matter niches for oligodendrocyte differentiation, we used homo- and heterotopic transplantations into the adult mouse cerebral cortex. White matter–derived cells differentiated into mature oligodendrocytes in both niches with equal efficiency, whereas gray matter–derived cells did not. Thus, white matter promotes oligodendrocyte differentiation, and cells from this niche differentiate more easily, even in the less supportive gray matter environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Transplantation and differentiation of adult OPCs.
Figure 2: Morphology of transplanted cells at 11 wpt.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dawson, M.R., Polito, A., Levine, J.M. & Reynolds, R. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 24, 476–488 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pringle, N.P., Mudhar, H.S., Collarini, E.J. & Richardson, W.D. Development 115, 535–551 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dimou, L., Simon, C., Kirchhoff, F., Takebayashi, H. & Götz, M. J. Neurosci. 28, 10434–10442 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rivers, L.E. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1392–1401 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu, X. et al. Development 138, 745–753 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang, S.H., Fukaya, M., Yang, J.K., Rothstein, J.D. & Bergles, D.E. Neuron 68, 668–681 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Okabe, M., Ikawa, M., Kominami, K., Nakanishi, T. & Nishimune, Y. FEBS Lett. 407, 313–319 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirrlinger, P.G. et al. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 30, 291–303 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fancy, S.P., Chan, J.R., Baranzini, S.E., Franklin, R.J. & Rowitch, D.H. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 34, 21–43 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Emery, B. Science 330, 779–782 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenberg, S.S., Kelland, E.E., Tokar, E., De la Torre, A.R. & Chan, J.R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14662–14667 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gudi, V. et al. Brain Res. 1283, 127–138 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Albert, M., Antel, J., Bruck, W. & Stadelmann, C. Brain Pathol. 17, 129–138 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Karram, K. et al. Genesis 46, 743–757 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fischer, J. et al. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1981–1989 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Simon, C., Götz, M. & Dimou, L. Glia 59, 869–881 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peters, P.J. & Pierson, J. Methods Cell Biol. 88, 131–149 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Werner, H.B. et al. J. Neurosci. 27, 7717–7730 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Trotter (Johannes Gutenberg-University) for the NG2-EYFP and F. Kirchhoff (University of Saarland) for the PLP-DsRed mouse lines, K. Karram for advice regarding cell isolation procedures, J. Ninkovic for help with the statistics, and E. Violette and S. Sirko for carefully reading the manuscript. We are also grateful to B. Sadowski for technical help with the electron microscope, as well as the technical assistants in the Physiological Genomics. W.M. is funded by the European Research Council Advanced Investigator Grant AXOGLIA to K.-A. Nave and is supported by the Cluster of Excellence and DFG research Center Nanoscale Microscopy and Molecular Physiology of the Brain. F.V. was, in part, supported by a doctorate fellowship from the University of Milan and an International Brain Research Organization InEurope grant. This work was mainly supported by the SFB 596 and the SFB 870 of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Helmholtz Association of Mental Aging and the Friedrich Bauer Stiftung.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.V. performed and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. W.M. performed and analyzed the immunoelectron microscopy. M.G. helped to design some experiments and wrote the manuscript. L.D. designed and supervised experiments, originally developed the transplantation technique, and wrote the manuscript. F.V., M.G. and L.D. discussed the results and implications and commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leda Dimou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–4 (PDF 1224 kb)

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Viganò, F., Möbius, W., Götz, M. et al. Transplantation reveals regional differences in oligodendrocyte differentiation in the adult brain. Nat Neurosci 16, 1370–1372 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3503

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3503

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation