Skip to main content
Log in

SNPs matter: impact on detection of differential expression

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

From Nature Methods

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Acyp2 is an example of a false negative induced by SNPs.

References

  1. Frazer, K.A. et al. Genome Res. 14, 1493–1500 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported by US National Institutes of Health grants AA010760, DA05228 and AA011114, and a Department of Veterans Affairs Merit Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–2, Supplementary Tables 1–3, Supplementary Methods (PDF 221 kb)

Supplementary Data 1

SNP Mask file for the Affymetrix MOE 430 2.0 array (Mas 5.0 format) which incorporates all known SNPs between the B6 and D2 strains at the time of publication. (TXT 106 kb)

Supplementary Data 2

SNP Mask file for the Affymetrix MOE 430 2.0 array (RMA format) which incorporates all known SNPs between the B6 and D2 strains at the time of publication. (TXT 228 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walter, N., McWeeney, S., Peters, S. et al. SNPs matter: impact on detection of differential expression. Nat Methods 4, 679–680 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0907-679

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0907-679

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation