Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The yeast two-hybrid assay: still finding connections after 25 years

  • Historical Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Methods

View current issue Submit your manuscript

The idea of using hybrid proteins containing transcription factor domains to analyze protein-protein interactions was described in 1989. Over the past 25 years, this method has begun to reveal the complex protein networks that underlie cellular behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1: A human reference interactome by 2020? (a) The invention of the yeast two-hybrid assay sparked the idea that protein-protein interaction networks should and could be mapped, as shown here for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Caenorhabditis elegans.

References

  1. Fields, S. & Song, O. Nature 340, 245–246 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chien, C.T., Bartel, P.L., Sternglanz, R. & Fields, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 9578–9582 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vidal, M. & Legrain, P. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 919–929 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, J.J. & Herskowitz, I. Science 262, 1870–1874 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, M.M. & Reed, R.R. Nature 364, 121–126 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. SenGupta, D.J. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 8496–8501 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Licitra, E.J. & Liu, J.O. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 12817–12821 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnsson, N. & Varshavsky, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10340–10344 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pelletier, J.N., Campbell-Valois, F.X. & Michnick, S.W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 12141–12146 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eyckerman, S. et al. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 1114–1119 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramachandran, N. et al. Science 305, 86–90 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vidal, M., Brachmann, R.K., Fattaey, A., Harlow, E. & Boeke, J.D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 10315–10320 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dreze, M. et al. Nat. Methods 6, 843–849 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oliver, S.G. et al. Nature 357, 38–46 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sulston, J. et al. Nature 356, 37–41 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bartel, P.L., Roecklein, J.A., SenGupta, D. & Fields, S. Nat. Genet. 12, 72–77 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fromont-Racine, M., Rain, J.C. & Legrain, P. Nat. Genet. 16, 277–282 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Walhout, A.J. & Vidal, M. Genome Res. 9, 1128–1134 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Uetz, P. et al. Nature 403, 623–627 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ito, T. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4569–4574 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Walhout, A.J. et al. Science 287, 116–122 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, S. et al. Science 303, 540–543 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Giot, L. et al. Science 302, 1727–1736 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rual, J.-F. et al. Nature 437, 1173–1178 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stelzl, U. et al. Cell 122, 957–968 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gavin, A.C. et al. Nature 415, 141–147 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gavin, A.C. et al. Nature 440, 631–636 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ho, Y. et al. Nature 415, 180–183 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Krogan, N.J. et al. Nature 440, 637–643 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rolland, T. et al. Cell (in the press).

  31. Venkatesan, K. et al. Nat. Methods 6, 83–90 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ge, H., Walhout, A.J. & Vidal, M. Trends Genet. 19, 551–560 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Han, J.D. et al. Nature 430, 88–93 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gu, L. et al. Nature doi:10.1038/nature13761 (21 September 2014).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marc Vidal is at the Center for Cancer Systems Biology (CCSB) and Department of Cancer Biology, and Department of Genetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,

    Marc Vidal

  2. Stanley Fields is at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Departments of Genome Sciences and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,

    Stanley Fields

Authors
  1. Marc Vidal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stanley Fields
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marc Vidal or Stanley Fields.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vidal, M., Fields, S. The yeast two-hybrid assay: still finding connections after 25 years. Nat Methods 11, 1203–1206 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3182

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3182

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation