Skip to main content
Log in

Improved reproducibility by assuring confidence in measurements in biomedical research

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Methods

View current issue Submit your manuscript

'Irreproducibility' is symptomatic of a broader challenge in measurement in biomedical research. From the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) perspective of rigorous metrology, reproducibility is only one aspect of establishing confidence in measurements. Appropriate controls, reference materials, statistics and informatics are required for a robust measurement process. Research is required to establish these tools for biological measurements, which will lead to greater confidence in research results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Begley, C.G. & Ellis, L.M. Nature 483, 531–533 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mobley, A., Linder, S.K., Braeuer, R., Ellis, L.M. & Zwelling, L. PLoS ONE 8, e63221 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lehrer, J. The truth wears off. New Yorker (13 December 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Naik, G. Scientists' elusive goal: reproducing study results. Wall Street Journal (2 December 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhadriraju, K., Elliott, J.T., Nguyen, M. & Plant, A.L. BMC Cell Biol. 8, 43 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ANSI/ATCC. Authentication of human cell lines: standardization of STR profiling (ASN-0002-2011) (ANSI/ATCC, 2011).

  7. Almeida, J.L., Hill, C.R. & Cole, K.D. BMC Biotechnol. 11, 102 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Almeida, J.L., Hill, C.R. & Cole, K.D. Cytotechnology 66, 133–147 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes, P., Marshall, D., Reid, Y., Parkes, H. & Gelber, C. The costs of using unauthenticated, over-passaged cell lines: how much more data do we need? Biotechniques 43, 575–586 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nardone, R.M. Biotechniques 45, 221–227 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Anonymous. Nat. Methods 10, 367 (2013).

  12. Brazma, A. et al. Nat. Genet. 29, 365–371 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor, C.F. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 889–896 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Plant, A.L., Elliott, J.T. & Bhat, T.N. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 487 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, K., Hogan, W.R. & Crowley, R.S. J. Biomed. Inform. 44, 163–179 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. The External RNA Controls Consortium. Nat. Methods 2, 731–734 (2005).

  17. Zook, J.M., Samarov, D., McDaniel, J., Sen, S.K. & Salit, M. PLoS ONE 7, e41356 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zook, J.M. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 246–251 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, L. et al. Cytometry A 81, 567–575 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, L. et al. Cytometry B Clin. Cytom. 72, 442–449 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dima, A.A. et al. Cytometry A 79, 545–559 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kharchenko, P.V., Silberstein, L. & Scadden, D.T. Nat. Methods 11, 740–742 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brennecke, P. et al. Nat. Methods 10, 1093–1095 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, A.R. et al. Nat. Methods 11, 41–46 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Grün, D., Kester, L. & van Oudenaarden, A. Nat. Methods 11, 637–640 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne L Plant.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Plant, A., Locascio, L., May, W. et al. Improved reproducibility by assuring confidence in measurements in biomedical research. Nat Methods 11, 895–898 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3076

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3076

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation