Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peering into the aftermath: The inhospitable host?

  • Between Bedside and Bench
  • Published:

From Nature Medicine

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Much of how the human host responds to a tumor and to anticancer therapy is still not fully fleshed out. The cytokines and other mediators involved in this response may be both allies and enemies in the quest for more effective treatments or even a cancer cure. In 'Bedside to Bench', Robert Kerbel and John Ebos discuss recent human studies in healthy individuals and people with minimal residue or no disease showing release of host-derived cytokines after antiangiogenic therapy. The increase in proangiogenic factors such as VEGF and PIGF and other cytokines involved in metastasis and tumor repopulation in a host may threaten therapeutic success but may also suggest new prognostic markers and other treatment strategies. In 'Bench to Bedside', Michael Karin and Florian Greten peruse how using JAK2 inhibitors to block STAT3 in tumors could halt cancer progression. JAK2 inhibitors, already being tested in clinical trials to treat myeloproliferative diseases, may also prove valid as anticancer drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: The host response to anticancer drugs: a useful tool or potential tempest? In addition to the positive effects of any anticancer treatment, a treated individual can experience negative side effects, as the tumor or the body responds to therapy.

References

  1. Murukesh, N., Dive, C. & Jayson, G.C. Br. J. Cancer 102, 8–18 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nikolinakos, P.G. et al. Cancer Res. 70, 2171–2179 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lindauer, A. et al. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 87, 601–608 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Deprimo, S.E. et al. J. Transl. Med. 5, 32 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergers, G. & Hanahan, D. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 592–603 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jain, R.K. et al. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 6, 327–338 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebos, J.M., Lee, C.R., Christensen, J.G., Mutsaers, A.J. & Kerbel, R.S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 17069–17074 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Desar, I.M. et al. Acta Oncol. 48, 927–931 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mancuso, M.R. et al. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 2610–2621 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaked, Y. et al. Cancer Cell 14, 263–273 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shojaei, F. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6742–6747 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahn, G.O. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8363–8368 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pàez-Ribes, M. et al. Cancer Cell 15, 220–231 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ebos, J.M. et al. Cancer Cell 15, 232–239 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Robert S Kerbel or John M L Ebos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerbel, R., Ebos, J. Peering into the aftermath: The inhospitable host?. Nat Med 16, 1084–1085 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1010-1084

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1010-1084

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation