Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Revisiting Reproduction: What a difference a gene makes

  • Between Bedside and Bench
  • Published:

From Nature Medicine

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Much can go wrong during the nine-month journey from single cell to birth—with infertility stopping the process as it begins and premature birth completing it before its time. These two major problems in reproductive biology are examined by Bruce D. Murphy, Yasushi Hirota, Jeeyeon Cha and Sudhansu K. Dey. In 'Bench to Bedside', Murphy analyzes studies showing how a single gene, FOXL2, may mediate many processes required for fertility. In 'Bedside to Bench', Dey and colleagues take a look at conflicting clinical findings testing progesterone as a therapy for premature birth: they conclude that much more work needs to be done at the bench, particularly in developing mouse models of parturition, before clinicians can successfully intervene to prevent birth from occurring prematurely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: FOXL2 affects follicle development at multiple stages.

Kimberly Caesar

References

  1. Boivin, J., Bunting, L., Collins, J.A. & Nygren, K.G. Hum. Reprod. 22, 1506–1512 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Uhlenhaut, N.H. et al. Cell 139, 1130–1142 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia-Ortiz, J.E. et al. BMC Dev. Biol. 9, 36 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beysen, D., De Paepe, A. & De Baere, E. Hum. Mutat. 30, 158–169 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tuteja, G. & Kaestner, K.H. Cell 131, 192 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moumné, L. et al. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 282, 2–11 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Köbel, M., Gilks, C.B. & Huntsman, D.G. Cancer Res. 69, 9160–9162 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Méduri, G. et al. Hum. Reprod. 25, 235–243 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jansen, E. et al. Mol. Endocrinol. 18, 3050–3063 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Magoffin, D.A. Fertil. Steril. 86 (Suppl 1), S9–S11 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Benayoun, B.A., Auer, J., Caburet, S. & Veitia, R.A. Proteomics 8, 3118–3123 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blount, A.L. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 7631–7645 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bentsi-Barnes, I.K., Kuo, F.T., Barlow, G.M. & Pisarska, M.D. Fertil. Steril. published online, doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.050 (14 November 2009).

  14. Kuo, F.T., Bentsi-Barnes, I.K., Barlow, G.M., Bae, J. & Pisarska, M.D. Cell. Signal. 21, 1935–1944 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce D Murphy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, B. Revisiting Reproduction: What a difference a gene makes. Nat Med 16, 527–529 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0510-527

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0510-527

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation