Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Right to Die

  • Book Review
  • Published:

From Nature Medicine

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Isaacs, B., Gunn, J., McKecham, A., McMillan, I. & Neville, Y. The concept of pre-death. Lancet. i, 1115–1118 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carstensen, L.L. The emerging field of behavioral gerontology. Behav Ther. 19, 259–281 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spranca, M., Minsk, E. & Baron, J. Omission and commission in judgment and choice.J. Exp. Soc. Psych. 27, 76–105 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asch, D.A., Hansen-Flaschen, J. & Lanken, P.N. Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: Conflicts between physicians_ practices and patients_ wishes. Am. J. Respir. Crit. CareMed. 151, 288–292 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, D.J., Guyatt, G.H., Jaeschke, R. Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. JAMA 273 703–708 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kapp, M.B. ‘Ageism’ and right to die litigation. Med. Law. 13, 69–77 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weir, R.F. & Gostin, L. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients: Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan. JAMA. 264 1846–1851 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Choice in Dying. Right-to-Die Legal Digest. (Choice in Dying, New York, 1994).

  9. US Dept.of Health & Human Services. Vital Statistics of the United States. US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Hyattsville. MD. (1993).

  10. US Dept. of Commerce. Statistical Abstract of the United States (113). US Government Printing Office. (1993).

  11. Christakis, N.A. & Asch, D.A. Biases in how physicians choose to withdraw life support.. Lancet. 342, 642–646 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. The SUPPORT Principal investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment (SUPPORT). JAMA. 274, 1591–1598 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

The Right to Die. Nat Med 2, 96–98 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0196-96

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0196-96

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Search

Navigation