The importance of cross-priming in vivo is controversial because its relative contribution in the presence of conventional priming is unclear. However, data from the examination of a conserved tyrosine residue in the cytoplasmic tail of MHC class I favor the cross-priming hypothesis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Zuniga, M.C. et al. Cell 34, 535–544 (1983).
Lizée, G. et al. Nat. immunol. 4, 1065–1073 (2003).]
Bevan, M.J. J. Exp. Med. 143, 1283–1288 (1976).
Heath, W.R. & Carbone, F.R. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19, 47–64 (2001).
Kurts, C., Cannarile, M., Klebba, I. & Brocker, T. J. Immunol. 166, 1439–1442 (2001).
Jung, S. et al. Immunity 17, 211–220 (2002).
Yewdell, J.W., Norbury, C.C. & Bennink, J.R. Adv. Immunol. 73, 1–77 (1999).
Zinkernagel, R.M. Eur. J. Immunol. 32, 2385–2392 (2002).
Norbury, C.C. & Sigal, L.J. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 15, 82–88 (2003).
Donaldson, J.G. J. Biol. Chem. 11, 11–18 (2003).
Guermonprez, P. et al. Nature 425, 397–402 (2003).
Houde, M. et al. Nature 425, 402–406 (2003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amigorena, S. Y in X priming. Nat Immunol 4, 1047–1048 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1103-1047
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1103-1047
- Springer Nature America, Inc.