Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Built-in resilience

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Geoscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

The 2010 Haiti earthquake showed that building codes must be adopted and strictly enforced. Furthermore, timely disaster recovery requires these codes to be supplemented by comprehensive hazard-insurance programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Margesson, R. & Taft-Morales, M. Haiti Earthquake: Crisis and Response (Congressional Research Service, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bilham, R. Nature 463, 878–879 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cavallo, E. A., Powell, A. & Becerra, O. Estimating the Direct Economic Damage of the Earthquake in Haiti (Inter-American Development Bank, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charvériat, C. Natural Disasters in Latin America and the Caribbean: An Overview of Risk (Inter-American Development Bank, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Commission Humanitarian Aid Department (ECHO) Factsheet Chile Earthquake (08/03/2010) (ECHO, 2010).

  6. Beittel, J. S. & Margesson, R. Chile Earthquake: U.S. and International Response (Congressional Research Service, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eberhard, M. O., Baldridge, S., Marshall, J., Mooney, W. & Rix, G. J. The Mw 7.0 Haiti Earthquake of January 12, 2010: USGS/EERI Advance Reconnaissance Team Report (US Geological Survey, 2010). Available at: http://go.nature.com/km5f7s

    Google Scholar 

  8. Styles, P. Geol. Today 26, 53–54 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T. & Davis, I. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters 2nd edn (Routledge, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lindell, M. K., Prater, C. S. & Perry, R. W. Fundamentals of Emergency Management Ch. 6 (Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2006). Available at: http://go.nature.com/wtFnvv

    Google Scholar 

  11. Palm, R. in Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance Against Natural Disasters in the United States (eds Kunreuther, H. & Roth, R. J. Sr) 51–66 (Joseph Henry, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  12. King, R. O. Earthquake Risk, Insurance, and Recovery: Issues for Congress (Congressional Research Service, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kunreuther, H., Onculer, A. & Slovic, P. J. Risk Uncertainty 16, 279–299 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindell, M. K., Arlikatti, S. & Prater, C. S. Risk Anal. 29, 1072–1088 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arnold, C., Eisner, R. & Elsesser, E. Buildings at Risk: Seismic Design Basics for Practicing Architects (American Institute of Architects, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank my colleagues on the US Advisory Committee on Earthquake Hazards Reduction for their helpful comments. However, none of the conclusions expressed here necessarily reflects views other than those of the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindell, M. Built-in resilience. Nature Geosci 3, 739–740 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo998

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo998

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation