Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The case for mandatory sequestration

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Geoscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

The fact that cumulative carbon dioxide emissions are more important than annual emission rates calls for a fresh approach to climate change mitigation. One option would be a mandatory link between carbon sequestration and fossil fuel extraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: SAFE carbon futures.

References

  1. Hansen J. E. et al. Open Atmos. Sci. J. 2, 217–231 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Solomon, S., Plattner, G.-K., Knutti, R. & Friedlingstein, P. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1704–1709 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allen, M. R. et al. Nature 458, 1163–1166 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Meinshausen, M. et al. Nature 458, 1158–1162 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Matthews, H. D. et al. Nature 459, 829–832 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zickfeld, K. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16129–16134 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. German Advisory Council on Global Change Solving the Climate Dilemma: The Budget Approach (WGBU, 2009).

  8. Stern, N. The Economics of Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2009 (IEA, 2009).

  10. Jackson, T. Alternatives to Growth (Sustainable Development Commission, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Capture and Storage (eds Metz, B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).

  12. Tickell, O. Kyoto 2: How to Manage the Global Greenhouse (Zed Books, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Victor, D. Nature 459, 909 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Keith, D. W. et al. in Geo-Engineering Climate Change (eds Launder, B. & Thompson, M.) Ch. 6 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (eds Nakicenovic, N. & Swart, R.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  16. Prins, G. & Rayner, S. Nature 449, 973–975 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tol, R. S. J. Economics E-Journal 2, 2008–25 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the Smith School Associates and Visitors Programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myles R. Allen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allen, M., Frame, D. & Mason, C. The case for mandatory sequestration. Nature Geosci 2, 813–814 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo709

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo709

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation