Skip to main content
Log in

Palaeomagnetism

In GAD we trust

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Geoscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Palaeomagnetists' basic assumption that Earth's magnetic field is a GAD, that is, a geocentric axial dipole, has been challenged by anomalous magnetic data from ancient Canadian basalts. At a closer look, fast continental drift could explain this anomaly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Magnetic reversals and their records.

References

  1. Pesonen, L. & Nevanlinna, H. Nature 294, 436–439 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nevanlinna, H. & Pesonen, L. J. Geophys. Res. 88, 645–658 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallet, Y., Pavlov, V., Semikhatov, M. & Petrov, P. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 16481–16499 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Swanson-Hysell, N. L., Maloof, A. C., Weiss, B. P. & Evans, D. A. D. Nature Geosci. 2, 713–717 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McElhinny, M., McFadden, P. & Merrill, R. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 25007–25027 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Opdyke, N. D. & Channell, J. E. T. Magnetic Stratigraphy (International Geophysics Series Vol. 64, Academic Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meert, J. G. & Torsvik, T. H. Tectonophysics 375, 261–288 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, Z. X. et al. Precambrian Res. 160, 179–210 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meert, J. In GAD we trust. Nature Geosci 2, 673–674 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo635

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo635

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation