Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of large ancient duplications associated with human gene deserts

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature Genetics

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

We identified 15 regions of >1 Mb in the human genome composed of large ancient local duplications corresponding to gene deserts. We detected these intrachromosomal duplications in mouse and dog but not in chicken; they present as patches of similarity as low as 60%. These findings suggest that some human gene deserts originated from duplications of segments lacking genes in a mammalian common ancestor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Dot-matrix analysis of LADs identified in the human genome.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lander, E.S. et al. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Waterston, R.H. et al. Nature 420, 520–562 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hillier, L.W. et al. Nature 434, 724–731 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hattori, M. et al. Nature 405, 311–319 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hillier, L.W. et al. Nature 432, 695–716 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grimwood, J. et al. Nature 428, 529–535 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedges, S.B. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 838–849 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ovcharenko, I. et al. Genome Res. 15, 137–145 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Nobrega, M.A. et al. Science 302, 413 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pevzner, P. & Tesler, G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7672–7677 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nobrega, M.A. et al. Nature 431, 988–993 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bailey, J.A. et al. Science 297, 1003–1007 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Samonte, R.V. & Eichler, E.E. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 65–72 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Iafrate, A.J. et al. Nat. Genet. 36, 949–951 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Murakami, Y. Hayakawa and technical staff of RIKEN Genomic Sciences Center for technical assistance; H. Watanabe, T. Kojima and T. Taniguchi for discussions and comments on the manuscript; and the providers of the dog genome sequencing project (The Broad Institute and Agencourt Bioscience) for use of the genomic data in public databases before publication. This work was supported in part by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Takehiko Itoh or Masahira Hattori.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Dot-matrix analysis for the comparison of human gene deserts containing LADs with mouse, dog and chicken sequences. (PDF 536 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Genes flanking LADs or the gene deserts containing LADs are listed from the Ensembl dataset. (PDF 87 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Itoh, T., Toyoda, A., Taylor, T. et al. Identification of large ancient duplications associated with human gene deserts. Nat Genet 37, 1041–1043 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1648

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1648

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation