Skip to main content
Log in

Alternative splicing and gene duplication are inversely correlated evolutionary mechanisms

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature Genetics

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Gene duplication and alternative splicing are distinct evolutionary mechanisms that provide the raw material for new biological functions. We explored their relationships in human and mouse and found an inverse correlation between the size of a gene's family and its use of alternatively spliced isoforms. A cross-organism analysis suggests that selection for genome-wide genic proliferation might be interchangeably met by either evolutionary mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Inverse relationship between the size of a gene's family and production of alternatively spliced variants.
Figure 2: Interchangeability between alternative splicing and gene duplication.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohno, S. Evolution by Gene Duplication (Springer, Berlin, 1970).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Hughes, A.L. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 256, 119–124 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lynch, M. & Conery, J.S. Science 290, 1151–1155 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brett, D., Pospisil, H., Valcarcel, J., Reich, J. & Bork, P. Nat. Genet. 30, 29–30 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Modrek, B. & Lee, C.J. Nat. Genet. 34, 177–180 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, J.M. et al. Science 302, 2141–2144 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Makova, K.D. & Li, W.H. Genome Res. 13, 1638–1645 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hedges, S.B. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 838–849 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Force, A. et al. Genetics 151, 1531–1545 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lister, J.A., Close, J. & Raible, D.W. Dev. Biol. 237, 333–344 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kondrashov, F.A. & Koonin, E.V. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 2661–2669 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Letunic, I., Copley, R.R. & Bork, P. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 1561–1567 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ast, G. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 773–782 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Remm, M., Storm, C.E.V. & Sonnhammer, E.L.L. J. Mol. Biol. 314, 1041–1052 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thanaraj, T.A. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D64–D69 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Derti for a critical reading of the manuscript and Y. Groner, E. Domany, M.J. Lercher, A. Bar-Even and S.J. Fleishman for discussions. I.Y. is a Koshland Scholar and D.L. is the incumbent of the Ralph and Lois Silver Chair in Human Genomics. This research is supported by the Crown Human Genome Center, the Abraham and Judith Goldwasser Foundation and the Koshland Center for Basic Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Itai Yanai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Independence of relationship with respect to binning. (PDF 95 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Independence of relationship to the number of exons. (PDF 41 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Independence of inverse relationship on the coverage of EST counts per exon. (PDF 92 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4

Inverse relationship shown on a gene family basis. (PDF 35 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 5

Results for Ensembl delineation of orthologous families. (PDF 54 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 6

Independent estimation of isoform count. (PDF 37 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Independence of relationship to the number of exons. (PDF 121 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 66 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kopelman, N., Lancet, D. & Yanai, I. Alternative splicing and gene duplication are inversely correlated evolutionary mechanisms. Nat Genet 37, 588–589 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1575

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1575

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation