This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
van Dijk, M. et al. Nat. Genet. 37, 514–519 (2005).
Oudejans, C.B. et al. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 10, 589–598 (2004).
Monk, D. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6623–6628 (2006).
Li, J. et al. Genomics 86, 489–494 (2005).
Kimura, M.I. et al. J. Hum. Genet. 49, 273–277 (2004).
Morison, I.M., Ramsay, J.P. & Spencer, H.G. Trends Genet. 21, 457–465 (2005).
van Dijk, M. et al. Gene Expr. Patterns 5, 61–65 (2004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Fig. 1
Biallelic expression of mouse Ctnna3, Mawbp and Stox1 in E14.5 embryo and placenta samples from C57Bl/6 × Mus musculus castaneus interspecies hybrids. (PDF 158 kb)
Supplementary Table 1
Patient phenotypes. (PDF 46 kb)
Supplementary Table 2
Primer sequences used for genotyping, mutation, expression and methylation analysis. (PDF 49 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iglesias-Platas, I., Monk, D., Jebbink, J. et al. STOX1 is not imprinted and is not likely to be involved in preeclampsia. Nat Genet 39, 279–280 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0307-279
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0307-279
- Springer Nature America, Inc.
This article is cited by
-
The significance of the placental genome and methylome in fetal and maternal health
Human Genetics (2020)
-
Familial aggregation of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction in a genetically isolated population in The Netherlands
European Journal of Human Genetics (2008)
-
Reply to “STOX1 is not imprinted and is not likely to be involved in preeclampsia”
Nature Genetics (2007)