Skip to main content
Log in

Critics weigh in on arsenic life

  • News
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Field needs independent experiments to prove or disprove the work, researchers say.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Wolfe-Simon, F. et al. Science doi:10.1126/science.1197258 (2010).

  2. Csabai, I. & Szathmáry, E. Science doi:10.1126/science.1201399 (2011).

  3. Schoepp-Cothenet, B. et al. Science doi:10.1126/science.1201438 (2011).

  4. Benner, S. A. Science doi:10.1126/science.1201304 (2011).

  5. Redfield, R. J. Science doi:10.1126/science.1201482 (2011).

  6. Foster, P. L. Science doi:10.1126/science.1201551 (2011).

  7. Cotner, J. B. & Hall, E. K. Science doi:10.1126/science.1201943 (2011).

  8. Oehler, S. Science doi:10.1126/science.1201381 (2011).

  9. Borhani, D. W. Science doi:10.1126/science.1201255 (2011).

  10. Wolfe-Simon, F. et al. Science doi:10.1126/science.1202098 (2011).

  11. Rosen, B. P., Ajees, A. A. & McDermott, T. R. BioEssays 33, 350-357 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Silver, S. & Phung, L. T. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 315, 79-80 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Follow Erika on Twitter at @Erika_Check

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Nature Reviews Microbiology

Related external links

Felisa Wolfe-Simon

Rosemary Redfield's blog

Simon Silver

John Helmann

Barry Rosen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Check Hayden, E. Critics weigh in on arsenic life. Nature (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2011.333

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2011.333

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation