Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotriptors: why newer may not be better

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

From Nature Clinical Practice Urology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Portis AJ et al. (2003) Matched pair analysis of shock wave lithotripsy effectiveness for comparison of lithotriptors. J Urol 169: 58–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Graber SF et al. (2003) A prospective randomized trial comparing 2 lithotriptors for stone disintegration and induced renal trauma. J Urol 169: 54–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sapozhnikov OA et al. (2002) Effect of overpressure and pulse repetition frequency on cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy. J Acoust Soc Am 112: 1183–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pace KT et al. (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Urol 174: 595–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Willis LR et al. (2005) Shockwave lithotripsy: dose-related effects on renal structure, hemodynamics, and tubular function. J Endourol 19: 90–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The synopsis was written by Sandra Ford, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami,

    Raymond J Leveillee & Robert I Carey

  2. Department of Urology at the Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, FL, USA

    Raymond J Leveillee & Robert I Carey

Authors
  1. Raymond J Leveillee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert I Carey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond J Leveillee.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leveillee, R., Carey, R. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotriptors: why newer may not be better. Nat Rev Urol 3, 76–77 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0403

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0403

  • Springer Nature Limited

Search

Navigation