Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is intravenous iron supplementation with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents beneficial in cancer patients with anemia?

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

From Nature Clinical Practice Oncology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced anemia is often an important problem for cancer patients, and this complication can be treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). This commentary discusses the findings of a study by Bastit et al., in which 396 patients with nonmyeloid malignancies and chemotherapy-induced anemia were treated with darbepoetin alfa with or without intravenous iron. This phase III trial showed that intravenous iron supplementation increases the hematopoietic response rates to ESAs in cancer patients; however, this study provides no information as to whether all cancer patients with anemia should receive intravenous iron as well as treatment with ESAs. Further data are needed to identify those patients who might benefit from intravenous iron supplementation in addition to ESAs, in order to avoid overtreatment of patients who are unlikely to benefit from the additional iron. As both ESAs and intravenous iron have known short-term and long-term risks, identification of reliable predictors of response that can guide these treatments is necessary before this strategy can be implemented into practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Rizzo JD et al. (2008) Use of epoetin and darbepoetin in patients with cancer: 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Society of Hematology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 26: 132–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bastit L et al. (2008) Randomized, multicenter, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alpha administered every 3 weeks with or without intravenous iron in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. J Clin Oncol 26: 1611–1618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Auerbach M et al. (2004) Intravenous iron optimizes the response to recombinant human erythropoietin in cancer patients with chemotherapy-related anemia: a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 22: 1301–1307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Henry DH et al. (2007) Intravenous ferric gluconate significantly improves response to epoetin alfa versus oral iron or no iron in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Oncologist 12: 231–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hedenus M et al. (2007) Addition of intravenous iron to epoetin beta increases hemoglobin response and decreases epoetin dose requirement in anemic patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies: a randomized multicenter study. Leukemia 21: 627–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pedrazzoli P et al. (2008) Randomized trial of intravenous iron supplementation in patients with chemotherapy-related anemia without iron deficiency treated with darbepoetin alpha. J Clin Oncol 26: 1619–1625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedenus M and Birgegård G (2008) The role of iron supplementation during epoietin treatment for cancer-related anemia. Med Oncol [10.1007/s12032-008-9072-0]

  8. Katodritou E et al. (2008) Use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents and intravenous iron for cancer and treatment-related anaemia: the need for predictors and indicators of effectiveness has not abated. Br J Haematol 142: 3–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bohlius, J. Is intravenous iron supplementation with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents beneficial in cancer patients with anemia?. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 5, 688–689 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1252

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1252

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation