Skip to main content
Log in

Can focusing on UPDRS Part II make assessments of Parkinson disease progression more efficient?

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Neurology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Abstract

Harrison et al. have attempted to validate Part II of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS II) as a medication-independent measure of disease progression. The authors collected cross-sectional data from a cohort of 888 patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease, and they found a robust association between UPDRS II scores and disease duration. Other variables considered were the patients' levodopa status, age at disease onset, and scores on UPDRS I, II and III. The results suggest that a single UPDRS II measurement might be a good indicator of progression at a given time point, irrespective of the current disease-related circumstances. This concept is attractive in its simplicity and patient-centeredness. However, this evidence came from a single-center, retrospective study, the statistical model was constructed using a nonvalidated surrogate as an independent variable, and no external replication was conducted. Until further confirmation, therefore, Harrison et al.'s proposal can only be considered to be a working hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. MB Harrison et al. (2008) UPDRS activity of daily living score as a marker of Parkinson's disease progression. Mov Disord [10.1002/mds.22335]

  2. Marras C et al. (2002) Predicting motor decline and disability in Parkinson disease: a systematic review. Arch Neurol 59: 1724–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sampaio C and Rascol O (2006) Disease-modifying strategies in Parkinson's disease. In Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, edn 5, 102–109 (Eds Tolosa E and Jankovic J) Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eckert T et al. (2007) Assessment of the progression of Parkinson's disease: a metabolic network approach. Lancet Neurol 6: 926–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goetz CG et al. (2003) Standardized training tools for the UPDRS activities of daily living scale: newly available teaching program. Mov Disord 18: 1455–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gallagher DA and Schrag A (2008) Impact of newer pharmacological treatments on quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease. CNS Drugs 22: 563–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Post B et al. (2007) Prognostic factors for the progression of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Mov Disord 22: 1839–1851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shulman LM et al. (2008) The evolution of disability in Parkinson disease. Mov Disord 23: 790–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goetz CG et al. (2008) Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord 23: 2129–2170

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sampaio, C. Can focusing on UPDRS Part II make assessments of Parkinson disease progression more efficient?. Nat Rev Neurol 5, 130–131 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro1049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro1049

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation