Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Treating difficult or disruptive dialysis patients: practical strategies based on ethical principles

  • Review Article
  • Published:

From Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Abstract

For more than a decade, dialysis units have had to contend with an increasing number of difficult or disruptive dialysis patients. These individuals present a spectrum of behaviors, ranging from those that harm only themselves to those that physically endanger dialysis staff. Such behaviors can interfere with the ability of the dialysis staff to care for the patient in question and for other patients; in addition, threats or actual physical abuse jeopardize the health and safety of both patients and staff. In this Review, we discuss how the application of ethical principles can assist dialysis staff to balance their ethical obligations to disruptive and difficult patients with those to other patients and staff, and to establish policies and strategies for the treatment of these challenging patients. This approach also allows health-care professionals to identify the limited situations in which involuntary patient discharge from a dialysis unit is ethically justified.

Key Points

  • The number of difficult or disruptive dialysis patients is increasing

  • The severity of difficult or disruptive behavior in dialysis patients ranges from nonadherence to physical abuse that endangers others

  • Ethical principles provide a framework for making decisions about the management of difficult or disruptive dialysis patients

  • Nonadherent behavior that is not harmful to others does not justify involuntary patient discharge from a dialysis unit

  • Abusive behavior requires balancing of the disruptive patient's needs with those of other patients and staff

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forum of ESRD Networks (2005) Decreasing Dialysis Patient–Provider Conflict (DPC) Project. [http://www.esrdnetworks.org/dpc.htm] (accessed 31 March 2008)

  2. Simon JR et al. (1999) The difficult patient. Emerg Med Clin North Am 17: 353–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. King K and Moss AH (2004) The frequency and significance of the “difficult” patient: the nephrology community's perceptions. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 11: 234–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson CC et al. (1996) Working with noncompliant and abusive dialysis patients: practical strategies based on ethics and the law. Adv Ren Replace Ther 3: 77–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sukolsky A (2004) Patients who try our patience. Am J Kidney Dis 44: 893–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Orentlicher D (1991) Denying treatment to the noncompliant patient. JAMA 265: 1579–1582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Levinsky NG et al. (1999) What is our duty to a “hateful” patient? Differing approaches to a disruptive dialysis patient. Am J Kidney Dis 34: 775–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mid-Atlantic Renal Coalition (1994) Working with noncompliant and abusive patients. [http://www.esrdnet5.org/Education/Staff/NonCompPts.pdf] (accessed 14 May 2008)

  9. Rau-Foster M (2001) The dialysis facility's rights, responsibilities, and duties when there is conflict with family members. Nephrol News Issues 15: 12–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwartz M and Batson H (2000) Understanding the psyche of the disruptive patient in the dialysis facility. Nephrol News Issues 14: 40–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnstone S et al. (1997) The use of mediation to manage patient–staff conflict in the dialysis clinic. Adv Ren Replace Ther 4: 359–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller RB (1995) Treating the disruptive patient. Nephrol News Issues 9: 39–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baskin S (1994) Ethical issues in dialysis. Guidelines for treating the disruptive dialysis patient. Nephrol News Issues 8: 43, 50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 (1982) Payton v. Weaver. Wests Calif Report 182: 225–231

  15. Baines LS and Jindal RM (2000) Non-compliance in patients receiving haemodialysis: an in-depth review. Nephron 85: 1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown v. Bower, No. J86-0759(B) (SD Miss Dec 21, 1987)

  17. Lundin AP (1995) Causes of noncompliance in dialysis patients. Dial Transplant 24: 174–176

    Google Scholar 

  18. Department of Health and Human Services (2008) Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Conditions for Coverage for End-Stage Renal Disease Facilities. [http://www.cms.hhs.gov/CFCsAndCoPs/13_ESRD.asp] (accessed 15 May 2008)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. A Hashmi is a Nephrology Fellow at West Virginia University Hospital and AH Moss is a Professor of Medicine in the Section of Nephrology at the West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA.,

    Adnan Hashmi & Alvin H Moss

Authors
  1. Adnan Hashmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alvin H Moss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alvin H Moss.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hashmi, A., Moss, A. Treating difficult or disruptive dialysis patients: practical strategies based on ethical principles. Nat Rev Nephrol 4, 515–520 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0877

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0877

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation